At Aston University, four instructors teach Foundations of Business Analytics a large compulsory module for more...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
At Aston University, four instructors teach Foundations of Business Analytics a large compulsory module for more than 600 first year undergraduate students. The Aston timetabling team have split the students into seven groups and have scheduled module webinars into the following time slots: Slot 1: Monday Slot 2: Monday Slot 3: Monday Slot 4: Monday Slot 5: Monday Slot 6: Tuesday Slot 7: Friday 10 am - 11 am 11 am - 12 noon 12 noon - 1 pm 2 pm - 3 pm 3 pm - 4 pm 2 pm-3 pm 1 pm - 2 pm Liv Kim Dan Josh Slot 1 Slot 2 -1 -2 200 0110 The four instructors teaching the module are Josh, Liv, Kim and Dan. Josh is the module leader, and he was responsible to make a fair distribution of teaching duties among four of them. He already knows some of the conditions that need to be satisfied: Slot 3 0 1. Each of the seven weekly webinar slots need to be covered by two instructors exactly. 2. Each instructor will cover four slots except for Josh himself, who will cover two slots only. 3. ONNO 2 Mon He and Kim are the most experienced instructors and so he wants his two slots to be: one with Liv, one with Dan, and none with Kim. Josh now needed to find out preferences of each instructor for each time slot. So, he asked them all to use the scale (-2, -1, 0, 1, 2} to express their preferences, where -2 stands for 'very much against' and 2 stands for 'very much preferred'. Zero stands for 'neutral'. The following preference table emerged: 2 Tue Wed 0 Thu Slot 4 -2 Fri 2220 9AM 10AM Slot 1 Slot 5 2220 11 AM Slot 2 Slot 6 -2 2222 -2 Slot 7 12 PM 1PM 2PM 3PM 4PM Slot 3 Slot 5 Slot 4 Slot 6 NONO Slot 7 -2 0 -2 Two slots in a row 0 2 HINN -2 -1 Three slots in a row -2 -2 -2 -2 'Slots in a row' refer to slots that have no gap in time between them. For example, slots 2 and 3 are 'slots in a row' but slots 3 and 4 are not. Josh now has enough data to try to make a fair allocation of webinars. For such a small problem, a trial-and-error approach would work perfectly fine. However, since similar problems need to be frequently solved for other courses, Josh decided to use an optimisation approach to find a fair allocation. He is entrusting this task to you: the apprentice decision analyst. Your most important task is to: • Create an LP-based model that will produce a fair allocation of webinars to the four instructors. The model should work for any set of preferences specified by instructors, and it should be generic enough so that the same modelling principles/elements could be applied for more complex problems. You need to pay special attention to the objective function, where you may want to maximise the overall satisfaction score of the four instructors, or to maximise the minimum of the four scores, or some kind of combination of the two, etc. The objective measurement of 'fairness' is further complicated by the fact that instructors used different sets of scores to voice their preferences (e.g., the sums of scores provided by Liv, Kim, Dan, and Josh are -9, +2, +5, and -7, respectively). This may influence your choice of using absolute versus relative satisfaction scores for individual instructors. Your additional tasks are therefore to: . Explore, evaluate, and discuss various ways of defining 'fairness' through different objective functions. Justify your final choice of the objective function used in your model. Suggest an alternative approach of eliciting instructors' preferences that could potentially lead to a better 'fairness' model. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of the suggested approach relative to the one used by Josh. At Aston University, four instructors teach Foundations of Business Analytics a large compulsory module for more than 600 first year undergraduate students. The Aston timetabling team have split the students into seven groups and have scheduled module webinars into the following time slots: Slot 1: Monday Slot 2: Monday Slot 3: Monday Slot 4: Monday Slot 5: Monday Slot 6: Tuesday Slot 7: Friday 10 am - 11 am 11 am - 12 noon 12 noon - 1 pm 2 pm - 3 pm 3 pm - 4 pm 2 pm-3 pm 1 pm - 2 pm Liv Kim Dan Josh Slot 1 Slot 2 -1 -2 200 0110 The four instructors teaching the module are Josh, Liv, Kim and Dan. Josh is the module leader, and he was responsible to make a fair distribution of teaching duties among four of them. He already knows some of the conditions that need to be satisfied: Slot 3 0 1. Each of the seven weekly webinar slots need to be covered by two instructors exactly. 2. Each instructor will cover four slots except for Josh himself, who will cover two slots only. 3. ONNO 2 Mon He and Kim are the most experienced instructors and so he wants his two slots to be: one with Liv, one with Dan, and none with Kim. Josh now needed to find out preferences of each instructor for each time slot. So, he asked them all to use the scale (-2, -1, 0, 1, 2} to express their preferences, where -2 stands for 'very much against' and 2 stands for 'very much preferred'. Zero stands for 'neutral'. The following preference table emerged: 2 Tue Wed 0 Thu Slot 4 -2 Fri 2220 9AM 10AM Slot 1 Slot 5 2220 11 AM Slot 2 Slot 6 -2 2222 -2 Slot 7 12 PM 1PM 2PM 3PM 4PM Slot 3 Slot 5 Slot 4 Slot 6 NONO Slot 7 -2 0 -2 Two slots in a row 0 2 HINN -2 -1 Three slots in a row -2 -2 -2 -2 'Slots in a row' refer to slots that have no gap in time between them. For example, slots 2 and 3 are 'slots in a row' but slots 3 and 4 are not. Josh now has enough data to try to make a fair allocation of webinars. For such a small problem, a trial-and-error approach would work perfectly fine. However, since similar problems need to be frequently solved for other courses, Josh decided to use an optimisation approach to find a fair allocation. He is entrusting this task to you: the apprentice decision analyst. Your most important task is to: • Create an LP-based model that will produce a fair allocation of webinars to the four instructors. The model should work for any set of preferences specified by instructors, and it should be generic enough so that the same modelling principles/elements could be applied for more complex problems. You need to pay special attention to the objective function, where you may want to maximise the overall satisfaction score of the four instructors, or to maximise the minimum of the four scores, or some kind of combination of the two, etc. The objective measurement of 'fairness' is further complicated by the fact that instructors used different sets of scores to voice their preferences (e.g., the sums of scores provided by Liv, Kim, Dan, and Josh are -9, +2, +5, and -7, respectively). This may influence your choice of using absolute versus relative satisfaction scores for individual instructors. Your additional tasks are therefore to: . Explore, evaluate, and discuss various ways of defining 'fairness' through different objective functions. Justify your final choice of the objective function used in your model. Suggest an alternative approach of eliciting instructors' preferences that could potentially lead to a better 'fairness' model. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of the suggested approach relative to the one used by Josh.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Here is an LP model to maximize fairness in allocating webinar slots to instructors Sets I Instructo... View the full answer
Related Book For
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
Bookstores International, a bookstore chain, has been quite successful over the past few decades and is now in expansion mode. It typically approaches opening a new bookstore by first determining the...
-
Sentax Corporation is an international manufacturer of fragrances for women. Management at Sentax is considering expanding the product line to men's fragrances. From the best estimates of the...
-
Sketch the curve (x, y) = c together with and the tangent line at the given point. Then write an equation for the tangent line. x y = 1, (2, 1) -
-
Defendant Monty J. Person began working for Garage Solutions, LLC, in March 2015. Three months into his employment, Person was sent by the owner of Garage Solutions, Mark Fontenot, to Rexburg, Idaho,...
-
(Earnings Per Share) The stockholders equity section of Tkachuk Corporation appears below as of December 31, 2004. 8% cumulative preferred stock, $50 par value, authorized 100,000 shares, outstanding...
-
Who developed the relational model, when, and why?
-
A chemical constituent flows between three reactors as depicted in Fig. P11.15. Steady-state mass balances can be written for a substance that reacts with first-order kinetics. For example, the mass...
-
intergrate the following questions X 536-x2 dx
-
When would the auditor of a manufacturer need to examine variance reports in auditing inventory?
-
did the external auditors meet their ethical obligations? Should external auditors be expected to find fraud when they are deliberately misled by tmembers of top management?
-
Johnson Corporation's stock is currently selling at $38.93 per share. The last dividend paid (D 0 ) was $2.50. Johnson is a constant growth firm. If investors require a return of 16 percent on...
-
Suppose f(x)=x2+4 and g(x)=2x+1. Find the value of f(-2)g(-2).
-
Why do you think Domestic Violence is so prevalent in our communities? Please respond with a few sentences indicating why you think Domestic Violence is so prevalent in Orange County Communities. DO...
-
How changes in political environment effects businesses?
-
Prove the formula for (d/dx)(cos-1x) by the same method as for (d/dx)(sin-1x).
-
Financial information for Coltron and its 100% owned subsidiary, Tara, for the year ended December 31, 2013, is provided below: Coltron acquired its shares in Tara on January 1, 2013, buying the...
-
On January 1, 2011, Vairvais acquired 30% of the shares of Clarys for $60,000. At this date, the equity of Clarys consisted of: Share capital (100,000 shares) ......... $100,000 Cumulative other...
-
A company bought a machine for U.S. $50,000 on January 1, 2013. The machine is to be delivered in one week and is payable upon receipt of the machine. The company has not yet paid for the machine. It...
-
A client who is a director of a publicly listed corporation is required by law to refrain from trading that companys stock at certain points of the year when disclosure of financial results are...
-
Consider the pairwise correlations of monthly returns of the following asset classes: Based solely on the information in the preceding table, which equity asset class is most sharply distinguished...
-
Investing the majority of the portfolio on a passive or low active risk basis while a minority of the assets is managed aggressively in smaller portfolios is best described as: A. The coresatellite...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App