Bill 21 affirms that Qubec is a lay State (s. 1), and reaffirms the laicity of the
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Bill 21 affirms that Qubec is "a lay State" (s. 1), and reaffirms the laicity of the State based on the four following foundational principles (s. 2):
- The separation of State and religions;
- The religious neutrality of the State;
- The equality of all citizens; and
- Freedom of conscience and freedom of religion.
- Section 6 of Bill 21 mandates, under the principle of secular public services, that certain government employees (including school teachers, police, Crown prosecutors and judges) do not wear religious symbols at work.
- Section 34 of Bill 21 provides that the Act is enforceable notwithstanding sections 2 and 7 to 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [the "Charter"].
The legal challenge
- Bill 21 is currently being legally challenged.
- In Hak c. Procureure gnrale du Qubec, 2019 QCCA 2145 [Hak], the Quebec Court of Appeal mentions the use of the notwithstanding clause:
"Since the discriminatory effect of theAct is obvious, the legislature included the so-called "notwithstanding" clause, namely,section 34 of theAct, which expressly states that its provisions will have effect regardless ofsections 2 and7 to 15 of theCanadian Charter. It should be noted thatsection 33 of theCanadian Charter, which allows such a derogation, does not refer to section 28 of saidCharter, a matter that will be discussed below." [para 9]
Your task
- Time has quickly passed and the Hak case is now about to be heard by the Supreme Court of Canada.
- You are invited by the Court to act as an amicus curiae on this case.
- Specifically, the Court wants to understand how the principle of parliamentary sovereignty interacts with the principle of constitutional supremacy where a government invokes the notwithstanding clause. Are they in contradiction? If yes, can they be reconciled?
- What are the dangers of the notwithstanding clause regarding our rights and freedoms?
- Is there any other section of the charter that could be used to challenge Bill 21?
- A brief factum to support the argument.
Posted Date: