During the 1990's and early 2000's, one company dominated the mobile industry: Nokia. Established in 1871,...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
During the 1990's and early 2000's, one company dominated the mobile industry: Nokia. Established in 1871, the Finnish-born company gained a worldwide reputation for producing reliable, standard mobile phones that were internet- enabled and programmed with an array of multimedia features. Eventually, competition in the mobile phone sector rose in 2007 when Apple introduced the iPhone, and Nokia soon found its market share rapidly decreasing.1 Initially, Nokia predicted the smart phone craze would die out and consumers would return to standard mobile phones, but smart phones proved to be more than a passing trend. Nokia's management failed to understand the wave of radical innovation that revolutionized the mobile industry as Samsung and Apple produced and sold touch-screen phones. Nokia's failure to react to the changing competitive climate is reflected in the precipitous fall in its share price from the iPhone's introduction to Nokia's own smartphone introduction: its market share faltered, losing almost 10 percent On 3 September 2013, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer announced that Microsoft would acquire Nokia's mobile phone division for $7.2 billion. Microsoft had been looking for a way to enter the mobile phone industry to better compete with Apple and Google. In acquiring Nokia's services and devices unit, Microsoft took control of Nokia's mobile phones and smart devices, design team, licensing agreements, and approximately 32,000 new employees. Given Microsoft's prowess in software and Nokia's in devices, the acquisition was anticipated to be a smooth, successful transaction. Furthermore, both CEOs (Ballmer and Elop) acknowledged the acquisition as something that would build upon the existing Nokia-Microsoft partnership. The agreement marked a belated but bold move by Microsoft to upgrade its presence in handheld devices and signals an end to Nokia's long struggle to enter the hyper-competitive (and extremely lucrative) smartphone market. What negotiating skills brought negotiators to an agreement in one of the tech industry's largest acquisitions and what bargaining strategies can business negotiators use to bring competitors to a negotiated agreement in similar negotiation scenarios? This article briefly explores the dynamics behind the negotiations that saw Finland's phone giant join forces with icon of US technology and software, Microsoft. International Negotiation Behind the Microsoft and Nokia Deal Both sides had strong incentives to join forces. Nokia had lost significant ground in recent years to smartphone manufacturers, most notably Samsung and Apple, by failing to keep up with innovations such as touch screens. Having shed its underperforming handset business, Nokia planned to focus on telecommunications equipment, mapping business, and patent portfolio. Microsoft's Steve Ballmer first approached Nokia CEO Stephen Elop about a possible acquisition during the Mobile World Congress industry conference in Barcelona. Ballmer and Nokia chairman Riisto Siilasmaa conducted methodical, discreet negotiations across the globe in 2013. How to Overcome Cultural Barriers in International Negotiation: Merging Distinct Business Cultures As with any large merger or acquisition, this one faced even more complexity after the ink dried on the contract-namely, the challenges of integrating employees from different cultures. Merging distinct cultures can be a confusing, lengthy process - even without the added complexity of joining together two of the world's largest companies, each of which is emblematic of its mother country in its own way. It often makes sense to maintain each organization's unique identity and borrow from the best of both. Moreover, because national culture is just one facet of our identities, it pays to view negotiating counterparts as unique individuals rather than as cultural ambassadors. Keeping this in mind, it never hurts to infer strategies based on expected cultural norms so long as this acknowledgement is part of a holistic bargaining process aimed at creating value and forging workable, sustainable agreements. Ultimately, Microsoft did acquire Nokia, but according to Computerworld, Ballmer called it a 'monumental mistake' and ended up writing off billions of dollars, calling it an "impairment charge" of $7.6 billion, which was close to how much it paid for Nokia and its patents. As a result, 8,000 people worldwide lost their jobs. Questions: 1) In your view what type of negotiation occurred between Nokia and Microsoft? Would have been Distributive or Integrative? Why? 2) How would Nokia's position in the mobile phone industry have affected its negotiation strategy? 3) As both companies originated from "different cultures", how would that have impacted their tactics and goals? 4) What lessons would each company have drawn from the negotiation? During the 1990's and early 2000's, one company dominated the mobile industry: Nokia. Established in 1871, the Finnish-born company gained a worldwide reputation for producing reliable, standard mobile phones that were internet- enabled and programmed with an array of multimedia features. Eventually, competition in the mobile phone sector rose in 2007 when Apple introduced the iPhone, and Nokia soon found its market share rapidly decreasing.1 Initially, Nokia predicted the smart phone craze would die out and consumers would return to standard mobile phones, but smart phones proved to be more than a passing trend. Nokia's management failed to understand the wave of radical innovation that revolutionized the mobile industry as Samsung and Apple produced and sold touch-screen phones. Nokia's failure to react to the changing competitive climate is reflected in the precipitous fall in its share price from the iPhone's introduction to Nokia's own smartphone introduction: its market share faltered, losing almost 10 percent On 3 September 2013, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer announced that Microsoft would acquire Nokia's mobile phone division for $7.2 billion. Microsoft had been looking for a way to enter the mobile phone industry to better compete with Apple and Google. In acquiring Nokia's services and devices unit, Microsoft took control of Nokia's mobile phones and smart devices, design team, licensing agreements, and approximately 32,000 new employees. Given Microsoft's prowess in software and Nokia's in devices, the acquisition was anticipated to be a smooth, successful transaction. Furthermore, both CEOs (Ballmer and Elop) acknowledged the acquisition as something that would build upon the existing Nokia-Microsoft partnership. The agreement marked a belated but bold move by Microsoft to upgrade its presence in handheld devices and signals an end to Nokia's long struggle to enter the hyper-competitive (and extremely lucrative) smartphone market. What negotiating skills brought negotiators to an agreement in one of the tech industry's largest acquisitions and what bargaining strategies can business negotiators use to bring competitors to a negotiated agreement in similar negotiation scenarios? This article briefly explores the dynamics behind the negotiations that saw Finland's phone giant join forces with icon of US technology and software, Microsoft. International Negotiation Behind the Microsoft and Nokia Deal Both sides had strong incentives to join forces. Nokia had lost significant ground in recent years to smartphone manufacturers, most notably Samsung and Apple, by failing to keep up with innovations such as touch screens. Having shed its underperforming handset business, Nokia planned to focus on telecommunications equipment, mapping business, and patent portfolio. Microsoft's Steve Ballmer first approached Nokia CEO Stephen Elop about a possible acquisition during the Mobile World Congress industry conference in Barcelona. Ballmer and Nokia chairman Riisto Siilasmaa conducted methodical, discreet negotiations across the globe in 2013. How to Overcome Cultural Barriers in International Negotiation: Merging Distinct Business Cultures As with any large merger or acquisition, this one faced even more complexity after the ink dried on the contract-namely, the challenges of integrating employees from different cultures. Merging distinct cultures can be a confusing, lengthy process - even without the added complexity of joining together two of the world's largest companies, each of which is emblematic of its mother country in its own way. It often makes sense to maintain each organization's unique identity and borrow from the best of both. Moreover, because national culture is just one facet of our identities, it pays to view negotiating counterparts as unique individuals rather than as cultural ambassadors. Keeping this in mind, it never hurts to infer strategies based on expected cultural norms so long as this acknowledgement is part of a holistic bargaining process aimed at creating value and forging workable, sustainable agreements. Ultimately, Microsoft did acquire Nokia, but according to Computerworld, Ballmer called it a 'monumental mistake' and ended up writing off billions of dollars, calling it an "impairment charge" of $7.6 billion, which was close to how much it paid for Nokia and its patents. As a result, 8,000 people worldwide lost their jobs. Questions: 1) In your view what type of negotiation occurred between Nokia and Microsoft? Would have been Distributive or Integrative? Why? 2) How would Nokia's position in the mobile phone industry have affected its negotiation strategy? 3) As both companies originated from "different cultures", how would that have impacted their tactics and goals? 4) What lessons would each company have drawn from the negotiation?
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Negotiation Analysis Microsoft Nokia 1 Negotiation Type This negotiation between Nokia and Microsoft was likely a combination of integrative and distr... View the full answer
Related Book For
Global Marketing management
ISBN: 978-0470505748
5th edition
Authors: Masaaki Kotabe, Kristiaan Helsen
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these marketing questions
-
Assuming you need a presentation on this topic "any injustice to one of us is an injustice to all of us", create 2 different openers using any of the 4 techniques (Factoid, Narration/Anecdote,...
-
Googles ease of use and superior search results have propelled the search engine to its num- ber one status, ousting the early dominance of competitors such as WebCrawler and Infos- eek. Even later...
-
Read the case study "Southwest Airlines," found in Part 2 of your textbook. Review the "Guide to Case Analysis" found on pp. CA1 - CA11 of your textbook. (This guide follows the last case in the...
-
In Problems, assume that the populations are normally distributed and that independent sampling occurred. (a) Test the hypothesis that 1 2 at the a = 0.1 level of significance for the given sample...
-
Russ with taxable income less than $400,000 has never recognized any Sec. 1231 gains or losses. In December 2013, Russ is considering the sale of two Sec. 1231 assets. The sale of one asset will...
-
In Problem indicate true (T) or false (F). (-0.5) + (0.5) = 0
-
Explain the main accounting conventions underpinning the income statement.
-
In Lizzie Shoes experience, gift cards that have not been redeemed within 12 months are not likely to be redeemed. Lizzie Shoes sold gift cards for $18,000 during August of 2011. $4,000 of cards were...
-
: You are going to take over a Family owned business that has been in existence for 4 generations. However, you realize that you have adopted a hierarchical top down decision making style from your...
-
Indicate (by letter) whether the actions listed in the table will immediately increase (I), decrease (D), or have no effect (N) on the ratios shown in the table. Assume each ratio is less than 1.0...
-
Marine transportation is the oldest and most important mode of moving people and goods for travel and commerce. This has been especially the case in the development of Canada as a trading nation. The...
-
1. What is inflation? How is it linked to price? 2. Discuss the 2020 decision by the Federal Reserve to buy debt from larger firms. What was the goal of this policy? What were the unintended...
-
Given Fair insurance E(I) = $4,000 IS ' = $3,000 Is this insurance full or partial? Explain how you arrived at your answer 2. A person is asked to choose between 2 games: Game 1: Getting $200 with...
-
Distinguish between traditional, behavioral, and interactionist views of team conflict. How might each explain and deal with an episode of project team conflict?
-
Choose any business organization and describe the business or organization you are analyzing. 1. Analyze social media activities of the business and suggest improvements. 2. What are the strategies...
-
What role does Vietnam play in the global economy?
-
In the series connection below, what are the respective power consumptions of R, R2, and R3? R R www 4 V=6V P1-3 W; P2=3W; and P3= 3 W OP10.5 W; P2-1 W; and P3= 1.5 W P1=1.5 W; P2=1 W; and P3= 0.5 W...
-
One of the cultural dimensions singled out by Hofstede is the individualism/collectivism distinction. What would this categorization imply in terms of setting up a sales force for international...
-
Discuss the forces that favor a globalized product design strategy.
-
Under what conditions is a dual extension strategy advisable? When is product invention more appropriate?
-
What is the function of a steering gear?
-
A shaft running at \(1200 \mathrm{rpm}\) is connected to a second shaft by a Hooke's joint. The angle between the axes of the shafts is \(15^{\circ}\). Determine the velocity and acceleration of the...
-
Watt mechanism is capable of generating (a) approximate straight line (b) exact straight line (c) approximate circular path (d) exact circular path.
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App