Founded in France in 1833, Lafarge became a successful global industrial company specializing in three product...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Founded in France in 1833, Lafarge became a successful global industrial company specializing in three product areas-cement, construction aggregates, and concrete. The other party in a "merger of equals," which required well over a year to design and bring to the conclusion the firms intended, is Holcim, a materials and aggregates company that was founded in Switzerland in 1912. Holcim's global ambitions were obvious early when the firm expanded into France and throughout Europe and the Middle East during the 1920s. This expansion resulted in long-term and active competitions between Lafarge and Holcim. In April of 2014, Lafarge and Holcim announced that they had settled on terms that would result in a merger of equals and that, accordingly, they were prepared to seek regulatory approval of the proposed transaction. Obtaining such approvals was anticipated to be challeng- ing given that the diversity of the independent firms global operations meant that 15 or so different jurisdictions could potentially object to a merger between the firms. What influenced Lafarge and Holcim to want to merge as coequals given the difficulties of doing so? The prevailing thought is that mergers of equals are always more fragile to bring about in light of the need to effec- tively meld what are commonly two different cultures and specify the leadership structure that will be used to oper- ate the newly created firm. These issues are in addition to a core one of identifying the financial aspects of the transactions that will appeal to each firm's shareholders. In spite of challenges such as these, Lafarge and Holcim thought that merging as equals would create a firm with enhanced and significant competitive abili- ties. Leaders of the two firms concluded that together LafargeHolcim, the agreed-upon name for the combined firm, would have the most balanced and diversified port- folio in the building materials industry. The firms antic- ipated that integrating their operations would generate approximately $1.5 billion in annual cost savings. In an overall sense, company leaders thought that the antic- ipated positive benefits of merging would come about primarily as a result of being able to meld Holcim's mar- keting strengths with Lafarge's innovation capabilities. Perhaps not unexpectedly, the transaction proposed between Lafarge and Holcim almost fell apart. This hap- pened in March of 2015 when Holcim's board, "after first agreeing to a $44 billion merger with Lafarge, rejected the deal's terms as undervaluing Holcim. Corporate leadership also was a concern." This objection surfaced after the firms had received regulatory approvals from key jurisdictions, including the European Union, India, and the United States, regarding the number of divestitures of units they would make to prevent them from having highly concen- trated positions in different global markets. At the core of the dispute was the conviction among Holcim's board members that the financial terms should be more attractive for their shareholders and that Lafarge's CEO should not be appointed as CEO of the newly created firm. One reason for these convictions was that in the nearly one year since terms of the initial merger were agreed upon. Holcim's "operating performance and share price had outperformed those of Lafarge." After restructuring the financing of the transaction and agreeing that a different CEO would be appointed for the new firm, 94 percent of Holcim's share- holders approved the transaction's terms. After dealing with challenges, Lafarge Holcim became a firm that was a merger of equals in July 2015. Speaking to the future, one board member said that "this isn't just another merger. It is an opportunity to create a new Number One in our industry." Assuming that this merger of equals achieves the potential some anticipate, all of the work required to bring it about will be validated. Going forward though, implementation challenges may come into play, at least in the short term, given the potential incompatibility of Holcim's decentralized management approach with the more centralized approach that charac- terized Lafarge when it competed as an independent firm. In fact, in 2016 one year after the merger, the merged firm was not performing well relative to smaller competi- tors. At its one year anniversary, "LafargeHolcim has fallen 39 percent since its forerunner, Switzerland's Holcim, revealed plans to combine with France's Lafarge in April 2014. Irish building materials group CRH is up 29 percent in the period; HeidelbergCement is up by 13 percent. The Bloomberg European 500 index has shed just 1.5 percent." Given the progress that the firm said that they were making Case Discussion Questions 1. Of the "Reasons for Acquisitions" discussed in the chapter, which reasons are the primary drivers of Lafarge-Holcim merger strategy? 2. Given that there have been performance difficulties of this "merger of equals," which of the "Problems in Achieving Acquisition Success" do you believe have most likely affected this deal? in regard to the integration, their market valuation should have been higher. There are questions about the ability of LafargeHolcim to create economies of scale from its large size. One observer noted that "cement is inherently a local business and so scale economies aren't so easy," given that transporting it long distances is expensive. In September 2017, a new CEO, Jan Jenisch, was hired. When he launched the strategy to revive the company's fortunes, he announced that Lafarge Holcim would be "cutting costs, selling assets and focusing on fewer markets as the world's biggest cement maker." The firm also announced that it would write off $4 billion in assets and the "stock fell more than 7 percent after the strategy was revealed." Sources: J. Revill, 2018, LafargeHolcim's new CEO writes off over $4 billion and sets out strategy, Reuters, www.reuters.com: C. Hughes, 2016, Many unhappy returns for a $50 billion merger, Bloomberg, www.bloomberg.com. July 13, 2015, Holcim and Lafarge obtain merger clearances in the United States and Canada paving the way to closing their merger, Holcim Home Page, www.holcim.com, May 4, 2015, Lafarge to cut 380 jobs ahead of merger with Holcim, Global Cement, www.globalcement.com, May 19; M. Curtin, 2015, Holcim-Lafarge shows 'merger of equals' doesn't equal smooth sailing, Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com, March 16: M. Curtin, 2015, A 'merger of equals' is more fragile, Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com. March 16, J. Franklin, 2015, Holcim and Lafarge name post-merger board candidates, Reuters, www.reuters.com, April 14: J. Revill, 2015, Holcim moves step closer to Lafarge merger, Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com, May 8. 3. The new CEO, Jan Jenisch, has undertaken a restructuring strategy. Why do you think the market reacted negatively to this plan? 4. What would you suggest the firm do to improve it restructuring plan and ultimately its poor performance? Founded in France in 1833, Lafarge became a successful global industrial company specializing in three product areas-cement, construction aggregates, and concrete. The other party in a "merger of equals," which required well over a year to design and bring to the conclusion the firms intended, is Holcim, a materials and aggregates company that was founded in Switzerland in 1912. Holcim's global ambitions were obvious early when the firm expanded into France and throughout Europe and the Middle East during the 1920s. This expansion resulted in long-term and active competitions between Lafarge and Holcim. In April of 2014, Lafarge and Holcim announced that they had settled on terms that would result in a merger of equals and that, accordingly, they were prepared to seek regulatory approval of the proposed transaction. Obtaining such approvals was anticipated to be challeng- ing given that the diversity of the independent firms global operations meant that 15 or so different jurisdictions could potentially object to a merger between the firms. What influenced Lafarge and Holcim to want to merge as coequals given the difficulties of doing so? The prevailing thought is that mergers of equals are always more fragile to bring about in light of the need to effec- tively meld what are commonly two different cultures and specify the leadership structure that will be used to oper- ate the newly created firm. These issues are in addition to a core one of identifying the financial aspects of the transactions that will appeal to each firm's shareholders. In spite of challenges such as these, Lafarge and Holcim thought that merging as equals would create a firm with enhanced and significant competitive abili- ties. Leaders of the two firms concluded that together LafargeHolcim, the agreed-upon name for the combined firm, would have the most balanced and diversified port- folio in the building materials industry. The firms antic- ipated that integrating their operations would generate approximately $1.5 billion in annual cost savings. In an overall sense, company leaders thought that the antic- ipated positive benefits of merging would come about primarily as a result of being able to meld Holcim's mar- keting strengths with Lafarge's innovation capabilities. Perhaps not unexpectedly, the transaction proposed between Lafarge and Holcim almost fell apart. This hap- pened in March of 2015 when Holcim's board, "after first agreeing to a $44 billion merger with Lafarge, rejected the deal's terms as undervaluing Holcim. Corporate leadership also was a concern." This objection surfaced after the firms had received regulatory approvals from key jurisdictions, including the European Union, India, and the United States, regarding the number of divestitures of units they would make to prevent them from having highly concen- trated positions in different global markets. At the core of the dispute was the conviction among Holcim's board members that the financial terms should be more attractive for their shareholders and that Lafarge's CEO should not be appointed as CEO of the newly created firm. One reason for these convictions was that in the nearly one year since terms of the initial merger were agreed upon. Holcim's "operating performance and share price had outperformed those of Lafarge." After restructuring the financing of the transaction and agreeing that a different CEO would be appointed for the new firm, 94 percent of Holcim's share- holders approved the transaction's terms. After dealing with challenges, Lafarge Holcim became a firm that was a merger of equals in July 2015. Speaking to the future, one board member said that "this isn't just another merger. It is an opportunity to create a new Number One in our industry." Assuming that this merger of equals achieves the potential some anticipate, all of the work required to bring it about will be validated. Going forward though, implementation challenges may come into play, at least in the short term, given the potential incompatibility of Holcim's decentralized management approach with the more centralized approach that charac- terized Lafarge when it competed as an independent firm. In fact, in 2016 one year after the merger, the merged firm was not performing well relative to smaller competi- tors. At its one year anniversary, "LafargeHolcim has fallen 39 percent since its forerunner, Switzerland's Holcim, revealed plans to combine with France's Lafarge in April 2014. Irish building materials group CRH is up 29 percent in the period; HeidelbergCement is up by 13 percent. The Bloomberg European 500 index has shed just 1.5 percent." Given the progress that the firm said that they were making Case Discussion Questions 1. Of the "Reasons for Acquisitions" discussed in the chapter, which reasons are the primary drivers of Lafarge-Holcim merger strategy? 2. Given that there have been performance difficulties of this "merger of equals," which of the "Problems in Achieving Acquisition Success" do you believe have most likely affected this deal? in regard to the integration, their market valuation should have been higher. There are questions about the ability of LafargeHolcim to create economies of scale from its large size. One observer noted that "cement is inherently a local business and so scale economies aren't so easy," given that transporting it long distances is expensive. In September 2017, a new CEO, Jan Jenisch, was hired. When he launched the strategy to revive the company's fortunes, he announced that Lafarge Holcim would be "cutting costs, selling assets and focusing on fewer markets as the world's biggest cement maker." The firm also announced that it would write off $4 billion in assets and the "stock fell more than 7 percent after the strategy was revealed." Sources: J. Revill, 2018, LafargeHolcim's new CEO writes off over $4 billion and sets out strategy, Reuters, www.reuters.com: C. Hughes, 2016, Many unhappy returns for a $50 billion merger, Bloomberg, www.bloomberg.com. July 13, 2015, Holcim and Lafarge obtain merger clearances in the United States and Canada paving the way to closing their merger, Holcim Home Page, www.holcim.com, May 4, 2015, Lafarge to cut 380 jobs ahead of merger with Holcim, Global Cement, www.globalcement.com, May 19; M. Curtin, 2015, Holcim-Lafarge shows 'merger of equals' doesn't equal smooth sailing, Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com, March 16: M. Curtin, 2015, A 'merger of equals' is more fragile, Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com. March 16, J. Franklin, 2015, Holcim and Lafarge name post-merger board candidates, Reuters, www.reuters.com, April 14: J. Revill, 2015, Holcim moves step closer to Lafarge merger, Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com, May 8. 3. The new CEO, Jan Jenisch, has undertaken a restructuring strategy. Why do you think the market reacted negatively to this plan? 4. What would you suggest the firm do to improve it restructuring plan and ultimately its poor performance?
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
1 The greater competitive advantages and economies of scale that would emerge from joining the two companies are the key drivers of the merger strategy that has been proposed by Lafarge and Holcim The ... View the full answer
Related Book For
Business Ethics Ethical Decision Making & Cases
ISBN: 978-1439042236
8th Edition
Authors: O. C. Ferrell, John Fraedrich, Linda Ferrell
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these general management questions
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
Read the case study "Southwest Airlines," found in Part 2 of your textbook. Review the "Guide to Case Analysis" found on pp. CA1 - CA11 of your textbook. (This guide follows the last case in the...
-
Googles ease of use and superior search results have propelled the search engine to its num- ber one status, ousting the early dominance of competitors such as WebCrawler and Infos- eek. Even later...
-
You expect that Bean Enterprises will have earnings per share of $3 for the coming year. Bean plans to retain all of its earnings for the next three years. For the subsequent two years, the firm...
-
A model of the water molecule H2O is shown in Figure 9-B. Where is the center of mass? . 52 52
-
alphabetical order below are balance sheet items for Lopez Company at December 31, 2008. Kim Lopez is the owner of Lopez Company. Prepare a balance sheet, following the format of Illustration 1-9....
-
FHA Loan Company has 10,000 shares of \($3.50,\) no-par preferred stock and 50,000 shares of no-par common stock outstanding. FHA declared and paid the following dividends during a three-year period:...
-
Frequency response data for a process are tabulated below. These results were obtained by introducing a sinusoidal change in the controller output (under manual control) and recording the measured...
-
https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/finding-a-job/why-is-an-internship-important Pediatrician Assessment Description Review "Why Is an Internship Important?" located in the topic Resources. Select...
-
Locate the court case Ellis v. Jarvis et al., 117 AFTR 2d 2016-1932. Using only the head notes, answer the following questions: a. What issue(s) did the court address? b. What was the ruling of the...
-
Two pendulums have the same dimensions (length L) and total mass (m). Pendulum A is a very small ball swinging at the end of a uniform massless bar. In pendulum B, half the mass is in the ball and...
-
Students are to choose a capacity planning strategy. Students will also choose a department from the Receiving, Production, or Shipping departments to apply the strategy and develop a plan to...
-
Student: Robert Hamlin Date: 10/11/22 Assignment: Chapter 6 1. Dazzling Corporation manufactures and sells two types of decorative lamps, Knox and Ayer. The following data are available for the year...
-
The first harmonic of a series created by a standing air wave in a tube open at one end only is 35.4 Hz. If the length of the tube is 218 cm, calculate the speed of sound of the air. Use two digits...
-
Determining organizational priorities and needs for projects is important to project success factors. How do equity and SDOH fit in with your project Patient-Centered Communication Share a time when...
-
The skier departs the horizontal ski run with a speed of v=110 km/h, soaring into the air. Upon landing, the slope he/she encounters forms a 45 angle with the horizontal plane. Calculate the skier's...
-
Imagine you are the HR Director of a large hotel. You are having a chat over coffee with a fellow director. Persuade your colleague that recruitment and selection is highly important for the...
-
Explain how two samples can have the same mean but different standard deviations. Draw a bar graph that shows the two samples, their means an standard deviations as error bars. T S
-
1. What kinds of investment decisions drove Barings Bank, UBS, Bear Stearns, and Lehman Brothers to financial disasters? 2. How can an ethical corporate culture with adequate internal controls,...
-
Discuss the ethical conduct of AIG executives, and how a stronger ethics program might help the company to strengthen the ethics of its corporate culture. When American International Group (AIG)...
-
How has PETCOs ethics and compliance program helped it to deal with ethical misconduct? PETCO Animal Supplies Inc., one of the nations largest pet supply specialty retailers, boasts over 950 stores...
-
Show that \(\left(\frac{\partial C_{P}}{\partial P} ight)_{T}=\frac{6 B}{T^{3}}\) for a gas obeying the equation of state \(V=\frac{R T}{P}+A-\frac{B}{T^{2}}\). [Hint: We know that...
-
What are principal coordinates? What is their use?
-
Define these terms: mass coupling, velocity coupling, elastic coupling.
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App