I need to follow the below guidelines: I need help organizing and making this paper follow the guidelines and also help adding to it to make it 2 more pages long.

Introduction

 

• Begin with a clear introductory paragraph that captures your audience's attention. 
• End your introduction with a strong thesis statement:

 

• Classical Argument: your thesis will assert a clear position on the issue. (Your goal is to show why your position is valid and eventually refute part of the counterargument.) 
• Rogerian Method: your thesis will point out the controversy or disparity in opinions on the issue and suggest your solution to the . (Your goal is to find consensus and present a solution or a different way of thinking about the issue.) 

 

Body Paragraphs

 

• Begin each body paragraph with a strong topic sentence that asserts the main idea of that paragraph and clearly falls under the thesis or claim.
• Fully develop ideas in each paragraph. Be careful to explain any idea or term that may not be familiar to a general audience.
• Organize ideas in each paragraph so that your reader can clearly follow your thoughts and ideas. Use transitions between ideas and provide clear writing patterns that help your reader understand your ideas.
• Integrate a short quote or paraphrase from at least eight (8) of your ten (10) sources, following the guidelines of your chosen style (MLA or APA). 
• Include the counterargument to your claim. 

 

• Classical Argument: Your goal will be to refute part of the counterargument. Ideally, you will also provide a concession to at least one part of the counterargument to establish goodwill toward your audience.
• Rogerian Method: Your goal is to present two sides or views. Then, you should find consensus between the two and present a solution.

Conclusion

 

• End with a conclusion that briefly sums up your ideas and shows readers why they should care about your topic. (Do not simply restate all of your ideas in your conclusion.

My Writing:

"Unmasking the Role of Social Media in Promoting Extremist Ideologies: Lessons from 'Targeting El Paso'"

"In today's digital age, the influence of social media on society is undeniable, but what happens when this powerful tool becomes a breeding ground for extremism? Recent years have witnessed an alarming rise in the significance of social media platforms as conduits for the dissemination of extremist ideologies. As we delve into this complex issue, it becomes apparent that these platforms hold a substantial share of responsibility for the spread of extremist ideas. While it is evident that social media platforms have been used to promote extremist views, it's vital to analyze the platform's involvement in a larger context. Social media, at its foundation, is a tool for communication, and it is people who determine how they use this instrument. Assigning undue accountability to social media firms may lead to possible constraints on freedom of expression and a slippery slope of overregulation. Social media platforms are utilized for numerous reasons, from providing personal updates to debating vital social concerns. The problem comes in establishing a balance between combating extremism and ensuring free expression. Some believe that it's not the platform's fault but rather the obligation of users to utilize social media properly and ethically (Aguilera, 2021).

The relationship between immigration policy and extremism, as demonstrated in your research, could be more nuanced than previously thought. While it's true that immigration laws may impact the socioeconomic climate in the United States, it's necessary to understand the diversity of elements leading to extreme ideology. Extremism frequently comes from a mix of personal, societal, and political factors. Blaming immigration policy alone for the rise of extreme beliefs oversimplifies the situation. Furthermore, executing immigration regulations is frequently considered an issue of national security and sovereignty, and these policies are not only intended to combat extremism. It is feasible to confront extremism while preserving a fair and safe immigration system. Therefore, pushing for a full revision of immigration laws to prevent extremism could not be a viable or successful answer (Preston, 2023). However, this responsibility raises pressing questions about the boundaries of free speech and the role of the American government in safeguarding those boundaries."

"In the riveting exploration of 'Targeting El Paso,' we uncover a disconcerting reality: the internet and social media platforms have become breeding grounds for radicalization, perpetuating acts of violence that haunt our society. While some argue that social media platforms should be shielded from blame, portraying them as mere conduits for a much larger issue, others contend that individuals should bear full responsibility for their actions. In this discussion, we must strike a balance between personal accountability and acknowledging the pivotal role that social media plays in shaping and amplifying extremist perspective. Social media websites such as 8chan and Telegram could serve as breeding grounds for radicalization.The Frontline Documentary "Targeting El Paso" explores this concept in detail as it vividly depicts how these internet communities, forums, and chat rooms not only incite hatred but also actively promote violence while persistently spreading extremist views. For example, the documentary chillingly uncovers how 8chan played a significant part in propagating the El Paso shooter's manifesto. Furthermore, it emphasizes fellow users' subsequent joy, emphasizing the harmful influence of these networks in radicalizing individuals. How could this come to an enforced conclusion? It was made by President Donald Trump enforcing immigration policies ; however, this decision made it hard for immigrants and U.S. citizens to find jobs even though there were job shortages that positions that needed to be filled. Trump also thought that making the border wall bigger would also help so that he could say that he had done what he had said he was going to do during the election however that did not help all the violence or social media issues. The documentary also addresses the negative impact of social media corporations' algorithms and recommender systems. These algorithms, which are designed to boost user participation, frequently push content that is contentious or extreme to increase interaction. Because of this algorithmic push, misinformation, hate speech, and conspiracy theories have spread quickly, fueling the radicalization process. By exhaustively scrutinizing user behavior and preferences, these algorithms create echo chambers, further hardening extremist ideas and isolating individuals from different viewpoints. The video exposes social media networks' lack of effective oversight and response, highlighting severe issues. It emphasizes the delays in removing potentially harmful information, the challenges in discovering and holding persons accountable, and the obstacles to adopting effective moderation standards. As a result, these faults facilitate the spread of extremist ideology while impeding efforts to prevent violent acts. By failing to address this issue, social media platforms not only tolerate but also assist in the propagation of toxic and fatal viewpoints. 

The research conducted by Helbling and Meierrieks, as presented in their 2022 article "Terrorism and Migration: An Overview," offers a deeper understanding of the intricate relationship between terrorism and migration. Their comprehensive analysis highlights a critical facet often overlooked - the unintentional contribution of migration patterns and refugee presence to the dissemination of extremist ideologies. As societies become more diverse, some individuals within these communities may become susceptible to radicalization, creating fertile ground for extremist recruitment. This underscores the need to strike a balance between national security concerns and the humane treatment of refugees fleeing violence and persecution. Thus, addressing the root causes of extremism involves not only monitoring social media but also crafting immigration policies that promote integration and inclusion, ultimately reducing the appeal of radical ideologies.

Additionally, the article "Immigration Policies Hinder Immigrants and U.S.-Born Americans," published in The Tennessean on July 18, 2021, offers a compelling perspective on the implications of immigration policies on job opportunities within the United States, especially in STEM-related fields. It elucidates how restrictive immigration policies can unintentionally exacerbate job shortages in these critical areas. The evidence presented demonstrates that immigration reform has the potential to alleviate this issue. By allowing skilled immigrants to contribute their expertise, the nation can address its STEM workforce deficit and maintain global competitiveness. The link between immigration reform, job availability, and the fight against extremism is complex but undeniable. Policies that hinder the economic integration of immigrants and U.S.-born citizens not only perpetuate job shortages but also create environments where frustration and resentment may fester, inadvertently contributing to extremist sentiments. Therefore, this necessitates a comprehensive approach that confronts extremist propaganda on social media while also addressing the socio-economic factors that make individuals vulnerable to radicalization.

In conclusion, the Frontline documentary "Targeting El Paso" leaves no doubt: social media platforms are complicit in propagating and amplifying extremist ideology, which leads to acts of terrorism and violence. The evidence presented indisputably supports the premise that platforms such as 8chan and Telegram foster radicalization while algorithms unknowingly magnify extremist information. The lack of effective regulation exacerbates efforts to fight the spread of radical ideology. It is critical that we recognize social media platforms' undeniable accountability in the battle against online extremism since this is the key to ensuring a safer online environment for everybody.

Addressing terrorist messaging on social media via immigration policy is a complicated task. Even if we presume a substantial relationship between immigration policies and extremism, the efficacy of policy execution must be assessed. Changing immigration rules requires time and political determination, and the consequences may not be instant. In the meanwhile, extreme views continue to propagate via social media and other channels. Furthermore, it's crucial to acknowledge the limits of immigration rules in affecting individual behavior on social media. Policies may alter the socioeconomic environment, but they might not directly affect what people publish online. To tackle extremism successfully, a multi-pronged strategy is required, which involves social media platform responsibilities, law enforcement measures, and community participation. Relying simply on immigration policy to counter extremism on social media could not generate the intended consequences (Saunders, 2019).

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

To enhance your paper and meet the guidelines provided here are some suggestions Introduction Streng... View the full answer