Question le Ryan, the president of the Open Corporation, is considering leasing or purchasing equipment. Microtech...

 

Transcribed Image Text:

Question le Ryan, the president of the Open Corporation, is considering leasing or purchasing equipment. Microtech Corporation has offered to sell the Open Corporation the equipment at a price of $6010,000. Following its usual practice, the equipment is depreciated over four years, at the rates of 40% for the first year, and 20% for each of the remaining three years. The salvage value of this equipment is expected to be 0.4 Alternatively, the Open Corporation can lease the equipment from Scott Corporation. Four annual lease payments of $1.9 million are settled at the beginning of each year. Open Corporation can raise capital by issuing bonds with a yield of 12 percent, and the tax rate for Open Corporation is set to be 30 percent. After comparing the above two options, the Chief Financial Officer of Open Corporation, commented, "Scott's offer is financially unreasonable due to a negative NAL (i.e. net advantage to leasing) to our company. Therefore, the annual lease payments should be curtailed. Meanwhile, we can pay a security deposit to Scott as an incentive. This deposit would be returned on the expiration date of the lease contract." In response to CFO's comments, Ryan added, "If the leasing term is acceptable to us, this will suggest that a negative NAL should be brought to Scott. As far as I know, leasing is a zero-sum game between the lessee and lessor. I believe Scott reject our counter offer." After several rounds of discussion, Ryan eventually determines to propose a counter offer to Scott, with a reduced lease payment of $1.8 million on annual basis and a security deposit of $1,000,000.- (a) In light of the NAL calculation, comment on the following remarks "Scott's offer is financially unreasonable due to a negative NAL (i.e. net advantage to leasing) to our company. (12 marks) (b) According to the counter offer by the Open Corporation, evaluate the NAL to Scott. What is the reaction of Scott to this counter offer? The tax rate for Scott is presumed to be 40%. (14 marks) (c) Critically discuss Ryan's remark leasing is a zero sum game between the lessee and lessor". (12 marks) (d) Explain the rationale for lessees to accept a lease offer even if NALs are negative. (12 marks) (e) If the purchase of equipment is funded by bond issuance instead of own capital, do you consider this factor in NAL analysis? Explain Question le Ryan, the president of the Open Corporation, is considering leasing or purchasing equipment. Microtech Corporation has offered to sell the Open Corporation the equipment at a price of $6010,000. Following its usual practice, the equipment is depreciated over four years, at the rates of 40% for the first year, and 20% for each of the remaining three years. The salvage value of this equipment is expected to be 0.4 Alternatively, the Open Corporation can lease the equipment from Scott Corporation. Four annual lease payments of $1.9 million are settled at the beginning of each year. Open Corporation can raise capital by issuing bonds with a yield of 12 percent, and the tax rate for Open Corporation is set to be 30 percent. After comparing the above two options, the Chief Financial Officer of Open Corporation, commented, "Scott's offer is financially unreasonable due to a negative NAL (i.e. net advantage to leasing) to our company. Therefore, the annual lease payments should be curtailed. Meanwhile, we can pay a security deposit to Scott as an incentive. This deposit would be returned on the expiration date of the lease contract." In response to CFO's comments, Ryan added, "If the leasing term is acceptable to us, this will suggest that a negative NAL should be brought to Scott. As far as I know, leasing is a zero-sum game between the lessee and lessor. I believe Scott reject our counter offer." After several rounds of discussion, Ryan eventually determines to propose a counter offer to Scott, with a reduced lease payment of $1.8 million on annual basis and a security deposit of $1,000,000.- (a) In light of the NAL calculation, comment on the following remarks "Scott's offer is financially unreasonable due to a negative NAL (i.e. net advantage to leasing) to our company. (12 marks) (b) According to the counter offer by the Open Corporation, evaluate the NAL to Scott. What is the reaction of Scott to this counter offer? The tax rate for Scott is presumed to be 40%. (14 marks) (c) Critically discuss Ryan's remark leasing is a zero sum game between the lessee and lessor". (12 marks) (d) Explain the rationale for lessees to accept a lease offer even if NALs are negative. (12 marks) (e) If the purchase of equipment is funded by bond issuance instead of own capital, do you consider this factor in NAL analysis? Explain

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

a Ryans comment that Scotts original offer of 19 million annual lease payments is financially unreasonable due to a negative NAL is valid based on the ... View the full answer