Some activists have argued that international law and international trade agreements are undemocratic. They argue that because such agreements are generally written by non-governmental actors and exert such power in shaping national laws, they are not the product of democratic governance.

1. What specific laws, agreements, and their effects support the claim that international law/trade agreements are democratic?
2. What specific laws, agreements, and their effects support the claim that international law/trade agreements are undemocratic?
3. What specific laws, agreements, and their effects demonstrate that international law/trade agreements are the product of democratic governance?
4. What specific laws, agreements, and their effects demonstrate that international law/trade agreements are not the product of democratic governance?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

To address these questions its important to consider various perspectives and examples from international law and trade agreements Here are some specific examples for each category Supporting the Clai... View the full answer