Students will investigate and propose a psychiatric diagnosis based on the case study from the Gorenstein and

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Question:

Students will investigate and propose a psychiatric diagnosis based on the case study from the Gorenstein and Comer (2015) textbook Case Studies in Abnormal Psychology, chosen “Initial Call” discussion. This paper will include an in-depth overview of the disorder(s) within the diagnosis, treatment options for the diagnosis, and a sound rationale that explains why this diagnosis was made. Note that the diagnosis may include more than one psychiatric disorder.

The paper must present a thorough overview of each disorder within the diagnosis. Assume the audience has no prior knowledge of the disorder(s) within the diagnosis, and provide relevant and easy to understand explanations of each for the readers. When writing the paper, it is critical to convey all the necessary information in a straightforward manner using non-technical language. (Reference the Professional Voice and Writing (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. resource provided by the Ashford Writing Center for assistance.) Support the analysis with at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last ten years in addition to the course text.

The Psychiatric Diagnosis topical paper must include the following:

Explain psychological concepts in the patient’s presentation using professional terminology. Identify symptoms and behaviors exhibited by the patient in the chosen case study.

Match the identified symptoms to potential disorders in a diagnostic manual.

Propose a diagnosis based on the patient’s symptoms and the criteria listed for the disorder(s) in the diagnostic manual.

Analyze and explain how the patient meets criteria for the disorder(s) according to the patient’s symptoms and the criteria outlined in the diagnostic manual.

Justify the use of the chosen diagnostic manual (i.e., Why was this manual chosen over others?).

Summarize general views of the diagnosis from multiple theoretical orientations and historical perspectives. Include a discussion on comorbidity if the diagnosis includes more than one disorder.

Evaluate symptoms within the context of an appropriate theoretical orientation for this diagnosis.

Use at least two peer-reviewed articles to assess the validity of this diagnosis, and describe who is most likely to have the diagnosis with regard to age, gender, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and ethnicity. Provide a brief evaluation of the scientific merit of these peer-reviewed sources in the validity assessment.

Summarize the risk factors (i.e., biological, psychological, and/or social) for the diagnosis. If one of the categories is not relevant, address this within the summary.

Compare evidence-based and non-evidence-based treatment options for the diagnosis.

Evaluate well-established treatments for the diagnosis, and describe the likelihood of success or possible outcomes for each treatment.

Create an annotated bibliography of five peer-reviewed references published within the last ten years to inform the diagnosis and treatment recommendations. In the annotated bibliography, write a two- to three-sentence evaluation of the scientific merit of each of these references. For additional assistance with this portion of the assignment, access the Ashford Writing Center’s Sample Annotated Bibliography (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

The Psychiatric Diagnosis

Must include a separate title page with the following:

Title of paper

Student’s name

Course name and number

Instructor’s name

Date submitted

Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last 10 years in addition to the course text.

Must include a separate annotated bibliography page.

Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Case 18 You Decide: The Case of Julia

Hello, my name is Julia Smith. I was referred for an evaluation by the dean of student life at my university. People seem to think I have a problem, but I say I am fine. They say I am too skinny and that I spend too much time by myself, but I think I could be skinnier, and I don’t want to hear their criticism. I am in college on a scholarship which is based on grades and track and field. I had to lose weight to keep up on my times which meant I had to eat less and work out more. I also have to study, a lot! It is stressful, yes there is a lot of pressure, but I’m handling it! I probably could eat more but I don’t want to gain back what I lost. I really don’t sleep very much but I think it’s enough. I don’t know how people can say I’m too skinny, how can they tell that when my clothes are so baggy? My lowest weight has been 103 lbs. but I still looked chubby, so I stuck with my diet. Shouldn’t I be able to make my own decisions about my life?! I had to stop hanging out with my friends to study. i don’t see my roommate much at all but that’s just because we are both so busy. So now because of my mom I have to take more time out of my schedule for an evaluation. If you could get back to me to set it up that would be great. My number is 555-1234. You can reach me there any time unless I’m in class in which case I will get back to you as soon as i can.