The aim here is to make the reader think about what he or she would do if
Question:
The aim here is to make the reader think about what he or she would do if given final decision on what the law, court, agency chief, or private employer should say or do in such cases. Each decision must be justified based on the readers personal opinion instead of what established law or practice says. In sum, disregard the law in these cases and simply give your well-considered opinion What will you do? (b) And why? Provide details of how the situation should be handled. Your role is that of the final decision maker in the case. Mr. Tate is an avid hunter and a member of the local gun club. In his house Tate has all kinds of firearms, which he uses to hunt. One night he had a serious quarrel with one of his neighbors. In a fit of great anger, Tate went inside the house, pulled out one of his guns, and shot and seriously injured the neighbor. This was his first offense ever involving a firearm. Tate was convicted and sentenced to serve five years in a state prison. While in prison he was a model prisoner, and he was released on parole after only two years. Assume that both state and federal laws provide for Tate to be deprived of his right to own firearms. (a) Should he be allowed all his firearms back? If so, when? If not, why not? (b) What firearm restrictions would you place upon him? Summarize in one paragraph
Expert Answer:
As the final decision maker in this case I would not allow Mr Tate to have all his firearms back i... View the full answer
