Apple wanted to compete more effectively with Amazon’s Kindle so more iPad owners would read books on iPads instead of Kindle. Apple met with the six largest book publishers and promised them better prices for online book sales than they got from Kindle. The government claimed Apple committed a per se violation of the Sherman Act.

It contended it was enhancing competition. What view do you think prevailed? [U.S. v. Apple, 791 F.3d 290 (2015)].