# Question: Suppose that S1 and S2 are correlated non dividend paying assets that

Suppose that S1 and S2 are correlated, non-dividend-paying assets that follow geometric Brownian motion. Specifically, let S1(0) = S2(0) = $100, r = 0.06, σ1 = 0.35, σ2 = 0.25, ρ = 0.40 and T = 1. Verify that the following two procedures for valuing an outperformance option give a price of approximately $13.464.

a. Use Monte Carlo simulation to simulate both S1(T ) and S2(T ) to value the payoff max(0, S1(T)− S2(T ))

b. Use Monte Carlo simulation to simulate only S1(T )/S2(T ), and value the payoff S2(0) max(0, S1(T )/S2(T ) − 1)

a. Use Monte Carlo simulation to simulate both S1(T ) and S2(T ) to value the payoff max(0, S1(T)− S2(T ))

b. Use Monte Carlo simulation to simulate only S1(T )/S2(T ), and value the payoff S2(0) max(0, S1(T )/S2(T ) − 1)

**View Solution:**## Answer to relevant Questions

A collect-on-delivery call (COD) costs zero initially, with the payoff at expiration being 0 if S For the lookback put: a. What is the value of a lookback put if ST = 0? Verify that the formula gives you the same answer. b. Verify that at maturity the value of the put is ST − ST . Assume that S = $45, K = $40, r = 0.05, δ = 0.02, and σ = 0.30. Using the up rebate formula (equation (23.21)), find the value of H that maximizes (H − K) × UR(S, σ, r , T , δ), for T = 1, 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000. ...In this problem you will compute January 12 2004 bid and ask volatilities (using the Black-Scholes implied volatility function) for 1-year IBM options expiring the following January. Note that IBM pays a dividend in March, ...Using the CEV option pricing model, set β = 3 and generate option prices for strikes from 60 to 140, in increments of 5, for times to maturity of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0. Plot the resulting implied volatilities.Post your question