The cost of debt, rd, is generally less than the cost of equity, re, because debt is a less risky security. A naive application of the WACC formula may suggest that a firm could lower its cost of capital (thereby raising the NPV of its current and future investments) by using more debt and less equity in its capital structure. Give one reason why using more debt may not lower a firms WACC, even if rd < re.
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhy would a project that reaches the breakeven point (BEP) in terms of net income be potentially bad for shareholders? Assuming that there are no corporate income taxes, how can the costs of preferred stock and debt be estimated without finding a preferred stock and a bond beta? In what ways are non-U. S. (private- sector) initial public offerings similar to U. S. IPOs and in what ways are they different? What are the principal benefits of going public? What are the key drawbacks? What is a recapitalization? Why is this considered a pure capital structure change?
Post your question