Question: The Durbin Watson statistic for the ft of the least squares
The Durbin-Watson statistic for the ft of the least squares regression in this fgure is 0.25. Should you interpret the value of D as indicating dependence, or is it really an artifact of a different problem? (Note: The value of the explanatory variable is getting larger with the sequence order of the data.)
Answer to relevant QuestionsThis data table contains the listed prices and weights of the diamonds in 48 rings offered for sale in The Singapore Times. The prices are in Singapore dollars, with the weights in carats. Use price as the response and ...This data table gives annual costs of 223 commercial leases. All of these leases provide office space in a Midwestern city in the United States. For the response, use the cost of the lease per square foot. As the explanatory ...For this exercise, you’re a real-estate developer. You’re planning a suburban housing development outside Philadelphia. The design calls for 25 homes that you expect to sell for about $450,000 each. If all goes as ...The following correlation matrix shows the pairwise correlations among three variables: two explanatory variables X1 and X2 and the response denoted by Y. For example, corr(Y, X2) = 0.2359. (a) Why does it make sense to put ...These data give the prices (in dollars) for gold link chains at the Web site of a discount jeweler. The data include the length of the chain (in inches) and its width (in millimeters). All of the chains are 14-carat gold in ...
Post your question