The legal concept of stare decisis, which means “to stand on decided cases,” is an important factor in our system of law. Is it possible that previous cases, or precedents, do not always embody the exact same issues, concepts, and present- day circumstances as the current case to which the earlier one is applied and by which the current one is judged? What would you suggest as an alternative to the use of precedents?
Answer to relevant Questions1. Muscarello illegally sold marijuana, which he transported in a small truck. Police discovered a handgun in the locked glove compartment of the truck. A provision in the firearms chapter of the federal law demands a ...A number of firms accused of unethical behavior had established codes of ethics, or credos, and formal employee orientation programs. It might seem that these efforts had little influence on the practices of the firms. ...What would be the effect on the insurance business and the economy if there were no “burning to defraud” statutes? Explain strict liability and provide an example. Provide some examples of cases covered under the Eighth Amendment.
Post your question