# Question: Thirty volunteers participated in the following experiment The subjects took

Thirty volunteers participated in the following experiment. The subjects took their own pulse rates (which is easiest to do by holding the thumb and forefinger of one hand on the pair of arteries on the side of the neck). They were then asked to flip a coin. If their coin came up heads, they ran in place for 1 minute. Then all subjects took their own pulse rates again. The difference in the before and after pulse rates was recorded, as were other data on subject characteristics. Fit a regression model to “explain’’ the pulse rate differences using the other variables as independent variables. The variables were

PULSE = difference between the before and after pulse rates

RUN = dummy variable, 1 = did not run in place, 0 = ran in place

SMOKE = dummy variable, 1 = does not smoke, 0 = smokes

HEIGHT = height in inches

WEIGHT = weight in pounds

PHYS1 = dummy variable, 1 = a lot of physical exercise, 0 = otherwise

PHYS2 = dummy variable, 1 = moderate physical exercise, 0 = otherwise

a. Perform an appropriate test to determine whether the entire set of independent variables explains a significant amount of the variability of PULSE. Draw a conclusion based on α = .01.

b. Does multicollinearity seem to be a problem here? What is your evidence? What effect does multicollinearity have on your ability to make predictions using regression?

c. Based on the full regression model ( six dependent variables), compute a point estimate of the average increase in PULSE for individuals who engaged in a lot of physical activity compared to those who engaged in little physical activity. Can we be 95% certain that the actual average increase is greater than 0?

PULSE = difference between the before and after pulse rates

RUN = dummy variable, 1 = did not run in place, 0 = ran in place

SMOKE = dummy variable, 1 = does not smoke, 0 = smokes

HEIGHT = height in inches

WEIGHT = weight in pounds

PHYS1 = dummy variable, 1 = a lot of physical exercise, 0 = otherwise

PHYS2 = dummy variable, 1 = moderate physical exercise, 0 = otherwise

a. Perform an appropriate test to determine whether the entire set of independent variables explains a significant amount of the variability of PULSE. Draw a conclusion based on α = .01.

b. Does multicollinearity seem to be a problem here? What is your evidence? What effect does multicollinearity have on your ability to make predictions using regression?

c. Based on the full regression model ( six dependent variables), compute a point estimate of the average increase in PULSE for individuals who engaged in a lot of physical activity compared to those who engaged in little physical activity. Can we be 95% certain that the actual average increase is greater than 0?

## Answer to relevant Questions

Refer to Exercise 13.6. Include the square of each of the explanatory variables and all cross- product terms in your model selection procedure. a. Use a variable selection procedure with maximum BIC R2adj as the criterion to ...Refer to Exercise 13.72. Using the independent variable x, suggest a single general linear model that could be used to fit the data from all four laboratories. Identify the parameters in this general linear model. In ...Use the model you selected in Exercise 13.79 to complete the following. a. Estimate the average level of sulfur dioxide content of the air in a city having the following values for the six explanatory variables: x1 = 60 x2 = ...Refer to the study described in Exercise 14.11. a. Perform appropriate F tests and draw conclusions from these tests concerning the effects of the percentages of sweetener, air, and milk fat on the sensory ratings. Use α = ...A study was conducted to compare the effect of four manganese rates ( from MnSO4) and four copper rates ( from CuSO4 5H2O) on the yield of soybeans. A large field was subdivided into 32 separate plots. Two plots were ...Post your question