Hansen, a passenger on an America West flight, put a robotic head worth approximately $750,000 in the overhead compartment for storage during his flight. When he changed planes, he forgot to bring his robot head with him. By the time he realized what had happened, the plane with the robot head had already departed on another flight. Airline officials said they would retrieve it when the plane landed, and would ship it to him in San Francisco, but Hansen never received the head. He sued for damages for conversion and negligence. The airline was granted its motion for summary judgment on grounds that the loss was covered by a valid limitation of liability clause contained in the contract of passage and that the airline had offered Hansen the opportunity to insure the head for a greater amount, but he had chosen not to. Do you think the award for summary judgment should have been upheld on appeal? Why or why not?
Answer to relevant QuestionsBattistella entered into a contract to sell her veterinarian business to Martin. The sales agreement included a covenant not to compete for a period of five years and within a radius of 15 miles. This agreement included a ...Explain when a unilateral mistake can lead to a con- tract's being voidable. A seller agreed to give a buyer the first right to purchase the remainder of her property if she chose to sell it. When the seller became deceased, the buyer filed suit against the estate, seeking the option to purchase. The ...The McCartheys owned stock in a corporation that controlled the Salt Lake City Tribune. When that company merged with another company, as part of the deal, the McCartheys were told that they would have the right to ...Williams owns two trucks that he uses to transport, under contract, frozen produce. Williams drives one truck himself and employs a driver to drive the other one. He provides the driver with a CB radio, cell phone, and ...
Post your question