LTV Aerospace Corp. manufactured all-terrain vehicles for use in Southeast Asia. LTV made an oral contract with Bateman under which Bateman would supply the packing cases needed for the vehicles’ overseas shipment. Bateman made substantial beginnings in the production of packing cases following LTV’s specifications. LTV thereafter stopped production of its vehicles and refused to take delivery of any cases. When Bateman sued for breach of contract, LTV argued that the contract could not be enforced because there was no writing that satisfied the statute of frauds. Was this a valid defense? [LTV Aerospace Corp. v Bateman, 492 SW2d 703 (Tex App)]