All Matches
Solution Library
Expert Answer
Textbooks
Search Textbook questions, tutors and Books
Oops, something went wrong!
Change your search query and then try again
Toggle navigation
FREE Trial
S
Books
FREE
Tutors
Study Help
Expert Questions
Accounting
General Management
Mathematics
Finance
Organizational Behaviour
Law
Physics
Operating System
Management Leadership
Sociology
Programming
Marketing
Database
Computer Network
Economics
Textbooks Solutions
Accounting
Managerial Accounting
Management Leadership
Cost Accounting
Statistics
Business Law
Corporate Finance
Finance
Economics
Auditing
Ask a Question
Search
Search
Sign In
Register
study help
business
law for business
Questions and Answers of
Law for Business
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
Civil Code §1719, subdivision (a) provides in part that any person who draws a check that is dishonored due to insufficient funds shall be liable to the payee for the amount owing upon the check and
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (‘‘FDIC’’) brings this action to collect on promissory notes signed by certain former partners of the law firm of Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine,
Plaintiff, Robert J. Triffin, appeals from a * * * summary judgment dismissing his complaint for payment of a draft of defendant Cigna Insurance Company transferred to plaintiff by a holder in due
The issue in this case is whether a check cashing store qualifies as a holder in due course so that it can collect on a $10,000 check written by an elderly man who was fraudulently induced to issue
We granted certiorari in this case to address an issue of first impression in Colorado regarding whether under [UCC] § 1-201(b)(20) and [UCC] § 3-302, C.R.S. (2007), Colorado’s codification of
At issue in this sequel to State of Qatar v. First American Bank of Virginia (‘‘Qatar I’’) is the meaning and legal significance of the phrase ‘‘for deposit only’’ following an
Defendant Joshua Herrera pleaded guilty to one count of forgery * * *, reserving his right to appeal the district court’s determination that Defendant’s acts constituted forgery for the purpose
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The core issue presented by the motion is whether and to what extent a collecting or depository bank will be liable to the drawer or the
Appellant/defendant the Hyatt Corporation appeals the lower court’s Summary Final Judgment in favor of appellee/ plaintiff Palm Beach National Bank. * * * We affirm. J&D Financial
Define a wholesale funds transfer and identify the parties to such a transfer.
Define a consumer electronic funds transfer and outline the major provisions of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.
Discuss the relationship between a payor bank and its customers.
Discuss the duties of collecting banks.
Identify and explain the various stages and parties to the collection of a check.
Compare the warranties on transfer with the warranties on presentment.
Discuss the methods by which liability on an instrument may be terminated.
Discuss the conditions precedent to the liability of secondary parties.
Discuss the liability of makers, acceptors, drawees, drawers, indorsers, and accommodation parties.
Discuss contractual liability, warranty liability, and liability for conversion.
Discuss the limitations the Federal Trade Commission imposes upon the rights of a holder in due course.
Define and discuss personal defenses.
Identify, define, and discuss the real defenses.
Discuss the shelter rule and when a payee can have the rights of a holder in due course.
Discuss the requirements for becoming a holder in due course.
Discuss which types of restrictive indorsements are effective and ineffective.
Distinguish among a blank indorsement, a special indorsement, a qualified indorsement, and an unqualified indorsement.
Explain the imposter rule and the fictitious payee rule.
Explain what is necessary to become a holder of an instrument.
Distinguish among (a) transfer, (b) negotiation, and (c) assignment.
Discuss the effect on the negotiability of an instrument’s (a) being undated, antedated, or postdated, (b) lack of completion, and (c) ambiguity.
List and discuss the formal requirements that an instrument must meet to be negotiable.
Identify and discuss the types of negotiable instruments involving a promise to pay.
Identify and discuss the types of negotiable instruments involving an order to pay.
Discuss the concept and importance of negotiability.
This matter comes before the court on the motion of both parties to this action for partial summary adjudication and on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. * * * This is an action
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendants have filed a Grounds of Defense, asserting certain affirmative defenses to liability. Plaintiff argues
Case Summary Defendants-Appellants, Sam Yin (‘‘Yin’’) and Sophia Kung (‘‘Kung’’) appeal from the grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee,
Describe the basic types of contractual provisions affecting remedies and the limitations that the Code imposes upon these provisions.
Identify and discuss the ‘‘specific performance’’ remedies of the seller and the buyer.
Identify and discuss the money-oriented damages of the seller and the buyer.
Identify and discuss the obligation-oriented remedies of the seller and the buyer.
Identify and discuss the goods-oriented remedies of the seller and the buyer.
Wilson Trading Corp. agreed to sell David Ferguson a specified quantity of yarn for use in making sweaters. The written contract provided that notice of defects, to be effective, had to be received
Plaintiff contracted with defendant to deliver liquid nitrogen, primarily from its Michoud, Louisiana plant, to defendant’s oil refinery production facility located in Belle Chase, Louisiana.
Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (lease) with defendant T-Bar S Corporation (T-Bar) in May of 1992, whereby plaintiff agreed to lease certain cash register equipment (equipment) to T-Bar.
[The plaintiff, Bigelow-Sanford, Inc., contracted with defendant Gunny Corp. for the purchase of 100,000 linear yards of jute at $0.64 per yard. Gunny delivered 22,228 linear yards in January 1979.
Kenco Homes, Inc., sued Dale E. Williams and Debi A. Williams, husband and wife, for breaching a contract to purchase a mobile home. After a bench trial, the trial court ruled primarily for Williams.
Compare strict liability in tort with the implied warranty of merchantability.
Discuss the obstacles to an action based upon strict liability in tort.
Describe the elements of an action based upon strict liability in tort.
Discuss the various defenses that may be successfully raised to a warranty action.
Identify and describe the types of warranties.
What is a bulk transfer? When is it effective? What does revised Article 6 attempt to accomplish?
Discuss the rules covering (a) risk of loss in the absence of a breach, and (b) risk of loss when there is a breach.
When does the seller have a right or power to transfer title?When is the transfer void or voidable? By whom? Against whom?
Distinguish between a shipment contract and a destination contract. When does title and risk of loss pass under each?
Explain the relative importance of title under the common law and Article 2.
Identify and discuss the excuses for nonperformance.
Discuss the buyer’s right to revoke acceptance.
Explain when the buyer has the right to reject the goods and what obligations the buyer has upon rejection.
Explain the perfect tender rule and the three limitations upon it.
Explain the requirements of tender of delivery with respect to time, manner, and place of delivery.
Discuss (a) the UCC’s approach to the requirement that certain contracts must be in writing and (b) the alternative methods of compliance.
Distinguish between the common law’s mirror image rule and the Uniform Commercial Code’s (UCC’s) provisions for dealing with variant acceptances.
Discuss the significant changes Article 2 and Article 2A have made in the need for an offer to include all material terms.
Identify and discuss the fundamental principles of Article 2 and Article 2A.
Distinguish a sale and a lease from other kinds of transactions that affect goods.
Discuss the criminal liability of a principal for the acts of agents.
Discuss the tort liability of a principal for the (a) authorized acts of agents, (b) unauthorized acts of employees, and (c) unauthorized acts of independent contractors.
Explain how apparent authority is terminated and distinguish between actual and constructive notice.
Discuss the contractual liability of the principal, agent, and third party when the principal is (a) disclosed, (b) partially disclosed, and (c) undisclosed.
Distinguish among actual express authority, actual implied authority, and apparent authority.
In this products liability case, the plaintiff contends that she was badly burned by hot coffee purchased from the drive-through window of a fast food restaurant, when the coffee spilled on her after
Ted Kelso sued Bayer Corporation for strict product liability, alleging that the warning Bayer provided on its Neo-Synephrine 12 Hour Extra Moisturizing Spray was defective. * * * Ted Kelso began
***Appellants, Womco, Inc. (‘‘Womco’’), C.L. Hall [(Hall)] * * * appeal the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Navistar International Corporation
Dudley B. Durham, Jr. and Barbara L. Durham, husband and wife, and their farming and trucking corporations, Double D Farms, Inc. and L.B. Trucking, Inc petitions on December 20, 1983 * * *. On March
Belden, Inc., and Belden Wire & Cable Company (collectively ‘‘Belden’’) * * * manufactures wire, and [American Electronic Components, Inc ] AEC manufactures automobile sensors. Since
The narrow issue on this appeal is who should bear the loss of a truck and an attached haystack mover that was destroyed by fire while in the possession of the plaintiff, Israel Martin (Martin), but
This is an appeal by a buyer from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the seller dismissing the buyer’s claim for incidental and consequential damages resulting from damage suffered by the
Showing 600 - 700
of 1894
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Last