An employee worked for an agency that provides services to disabled persons in their homes. As employees sometimes needed to transport their clients to medical appointments and other places, the agency required that it service providers have “reliable transportation.” The employee had a working vehicle when she was hired, but it eventually died. She then borrowed her mother’s car to get to work, but the car was damaged in an accident and rendered inoperable. The woman, who was paid $9/hr, said that she could not afford to either get a new car or have her old car repaired at that time. The agency gave her two months to arrange reliable transportation. When she failed to do so, she was fired. The employee filed for unemployment compensation and the agency contested her claim. What should the court decide? Why?