Aroaz claims this constitutes a breach of contract entitling her to a share of the licensing fees obtained by the producer of the ad, including punitive damages for violating the contract agreement. What issues are at stake in this case? What facts should the court consider? in the entertainment industry, what does the term “residuals” refer to? Are there any precedents (similar court cases and ruling) that could impact the ruling in this case? Does Aroaz have basis for compensatory and/or punitive damages based on the facts of this case? Why or why not?

Prepare an essay arguing your position of whether the facts in this case have a legal basis under contract law.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

In 2009 New York promotion office Levinson Trachtenberg Group contracted with a performing artist Elena Aroaz to show up in a 30 second business that ... View the full answer