The City launched an investigation of her harassment complaint and found that the events that gave rise to the complaint did not constitute harassment. The City requested that the employee return to work. She refused. The employee, not satisfied with the results of the City’s investigation, sent an e-mail to two senior city officials and the mayor. She again alleged harassment and attacked the credibility and competence of her supervisors. The City then terminated her employment on the basis of insubordination and her failure to return to work. The employee sued for wrongful dismissal.

 Analyse the main problem using employee and labour law and Identify employee misrepresentation if any and as a judge please provide a verdict explaining why?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The case study given above talks about harassment at the workplace Labour laws of the US would categ... View the full answer