WEB Inc., had a corporate credit account with American Express. Cards were issued to four individuals, including a real estate broker who had a relationship with one of the company officers. When the relationship ended, the broker went on a spending spree for personal items and charged over $ 27,000 on the credit card. WEB claimed that under the Truth in Lending Act, it was not responsible for the broker’s charges. Is the claim correct?
Answer to relevant QuestionsClay stole a car from Mooney’s driveway. While driving the car down Main Street at an excessive rate of speed, Clay ran into Page’s store window, causing extensive damage. Can Mooney and Page bring a civil action against ...Steele, while a patient in a hospital, let a friend use her credit card to buy one tank of gasoline for a trip to Cleveland. The friend not only used the card to buy many other things but also let friends use the card. ...Friendly agreed to act as surety on a loan given by Ace Finance Company to James. When James could not repay the loan, Ace came directly to Friendly for payment without attempting to get the money from James. Friendly ...While bicycling, Gray was injured as he was leaving a park. A driver, insured by Allstate, was driving into the park on the same road as Gray, in the opposite direction. There was no collision. The driver had veered toward ...Bean signed an agreement to borrow $ 120,000 from Hazel. To protect Hazel, Bean was to insure his life with Hazel as beneficiary in an amount not less than the unpaid balance of the loan. Bean already had a life insurance ...
Post your question