Point for Discussion: Has Sandy acted in an unethical manner? What should Sandy’s response to the client be?
Answer to relevant QuestionsPoint for Discussion: Simon has no evidence that the truck contained anything legally owned by the megabank. He only has the statements of the old man and the note and cash. Should he report the details of the incident to ...Who in the law office is bound to keep attorney–client communications privileged? Point for Discussion: Why would this case be appropriate for use of the theory of res ipsa loquitur? What are the types of defamation actions? What would likely happen if it turned out that the child was in fact Hal’s but suffered from serious genetic defects inherited from Abigail, which she knew about but did not disclose?
Post your question