Analyze which argument is stronger than the other and explain why. Justify your position, not with opinion, but with your analysis of the quality of the evidence and reasoning. The Argument against Higher Education Being Free Many arguments are hinged on the burden on the taxpayer covering the cost of this free higher education idea. Some of their concerns are broken down into the following arguments: 

Premise 1: Free Higher Education implies that the government will cover the cost of tuition for all students. 

Premise 2: The government funds its initiatives and programs through taxes collected from the public. 

Premise 3: To fund Free Higher Education, the government will need to increase its revenue. 

Premise 4: One of the most direct ways for the government to increase its revenue is by increasing taxes. 

Premise 5: Therefore, if Free Higher Education is implemented, it will result in increased taxes. 

Premise 6: Increased taxes are a financial burden on taxpayers. Conclusion: That Free Higher Education will cause a burden on taxpayers. The Argument for Higher Education.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

implementing higher taxes on the public Conclusion Therefore implementing Free Higher Education will result in increased taxes for the public The Argu... View the full answer