Hello Everyone,

Hypothesis Testing in Child Protective Services

As someone planning to work with youth in child protective services, I would design a study to test whether providing trauma-informed training to caseworkers reduces the number of placement disruptions for children in foster care. Placement stability is critical for a child's emotional well-being and long-term success, so understanding the impact of training is essential.

Hypotheses

Null Hypothesis (H): Trauma-informed training has no effect on placement stability.

Alternative Hypothesis (H): Trauma-informed training reduces placement disruptions.

Variable to Test

The variable would be the average number of placement changes per child within six months.

My expectation: After training, the average number of placement changes will decrease from 2.0 to 1.2 per child.

Statistical Test

I would use a two-sample t-test if comparing the mean number of placement changes between two independent groups (trained vs. not trained). If the data are counts and follow a Poisson distribution, a Poisson regression with an offset would be more appropriate.

Impact of Results

If H is rejected: I would conclude that trauma-informed training significantly improves placement stability. This would support advocating for mandatory training and allocating resources to expand these programs.

If H is not rejected: I might explore other interventions, such as increasing family support services or improving the matching process for foster homes.

Hypothesis testing provides a structured way to evaluate interventions that can improve outcomes for vulnerable youth. By using data-driven decisions, we can ensure that resources are directed toward strategies that truly make a difference.

reply to