Question: signed an additional work order in the amount of $ 1 2 , 9 4 3 for TCG to install a customized firewall system. The
signed an additional work order in the amount of $ for TCG to install a customized
firewall system. The work orders stated that Holcomb would make monthly installment payments to
TCG and both parties expected the work would be finished by September. Due to unforeseen prob
lems largely attributable to system configuration and software incompatibility, the project required
more time than anticipated. By the end of the summer, the Web site was still not ready, and Holcomb
had fallen behind in his payments to TCG TCG threatened to cease work and file a suit for breach of
contract unless the bill was paid. Rather than make further payments, Holcomb wanted to abandon the
Web site project. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.
Would a court be likely to decide that the transaction between Holcomb and TCG was covered by the
Uniform Commercial Code UCC Why or why not?
Would a court be likely to consider Holcomb a merchant under the UCC? Why or why not?
Did the parties have a valid contract under the UCC? Were any terms left open in the contract? If so
which terms? How would a court deal with open terms?
Suppose that Holcomb and TCG meet in October in an attempt to resolve their problems. At that
time, the parties reach an oral agreement that TCG will continue to work without demanding full
payment of the past due amounts and Holcomb will pay TCG $ per week. Assuming the contract
falls under the UCC, is the oral agreement enforceable? Why or why
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
