Do a Porter 5-forces industry analysis of the soft drink industry but only focus on bargaining power
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
- Do a Porter 5-forces industry analysis of the soft drink industry but only focus on bargaining power of buyers (bottlers buy concentrate from Coke and Pepsi, so they are the buyers below above). Make sure you do a thorough analysis and fully explain how this one force contributes to industry profitability (of concentrate producers) by using the underlying reasoning (e.g., buyers are large and few in number relative to focal industry firms resulting in them purchasing a large portion of an industry’s output, buyers switching costs are low, buyers can pose threat to integrate backward into the sellers’ industry).
- Conclude how this force affects the industry attractiveness (or profitability) of bottlers as well as the attractiveness of concentrate producers (Coke and Pepsi) based on your analysis above.
- What could the bottlers do to increase their bargaining power?
Transcribed Image Text:
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 For more than a century, Coke and Pepsi vied for "throat share" of the world's beverage market. The most intense battles in the so-called cola wars were fought over the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry in the United States.¹ In a "carefully waged competitive struggle" that lasted from 1975 through the mid-1990s, both Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual revenue growth of around 10%, as both U.S. and worldwide CSD consumption rose steadily year after year.2 According to Roger Enrico, former CEO of Pepsi: The warfare must be perceived as a continuing battle without blood. Without Coke, Pepsi would have a tough time being an original and lively competitor. The more successful they are, the sharper we have to be. If the Coca-Cola company didn't exist, we'd pray for someone to invent them. And on the other side of the fence, I'm sure the folks at Coke would say that nothing contributes as much to the present-day success of the Coca-Cola company than... Pepsi. ³ That relationship began to fray in the early 2000s, however, as U.S. per-capita CSD consumption started to decline. By 2009, the average American drank 46 gallons of CSDs per year, the lowest CSD consumption level since 1989.4 At the same time, the two companies experienced their own distinct ups and downs; Coke suffered several operational setbacks while Pepsi charted a new, aggressive course in alternative beverages and snack acquisitions. As the cola wars continued into the 21st century, Coke and Pepsi faced new challenges: Could they boost flagging domestic CSD sales? How could they compete in the growing non-CSD category that demanded different bottling, pricing, and brand strategies? What had to be done to ensure sustainable growth and profitability? Economics of the U.S. CSD Industry Americans consumed 23 gallons of CSDs annually in 1970, and consumption grew by an average of 3% per year over the next three decades (see Exhibit 1). Fueling this growth were the increasing availability of CSDs and the introduction of diet and flavored varieties. Declining real (inflation- adjusted) prices that made CSDs more affordable played a significant role as well.5 There were many alternatives to CSDs, including beer, milk, coffee, bottled water, juices, tea, powdered drinks, wine, Professor David B. Yoffie and Research Associate Michael Slind prepared the original version of this case, "Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006," HBS No. 706-447. This version was prepared by Professor David B. Yoffie and Research Associate Renee Kim. This case was developed from published sources. HBS cases are developed solely as the basis for class discussion. Cases are not intended to serve as endorsements, sources of primary data, or illustrations of effective or ineffective management. Copyright © 2010, 2011 President and Fellows of Harvard College. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, call 1-800-545- 7685, write Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA 02163, or go to www.hbsp.harvard.edu/educators. This publication may not be digitized, photocopied, or otherwise reproduced, posted, or transmitted, without the permission of Harvard Business School. Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 For more than a century, Coke and Pepsi vied for "throat share" of the world's beverage market. The most intense battles in the so-called cola wars were fought over the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry in the United States.¹ In a "carefully waged competitive struggle" that lasted from 1975 through the mid-1990s, both Coke and Pepsi achieved average annual revenue growth of around 10%, as both U.S. and worldwide CSD consumption rose steadily year after year.2 According to Roger Enrico, former CEO of Pepsi: The warfare must be perceived as a continuing battle without blood. Without Coke, Pepsi would have a tough time being an original and lively competitor. The more successful they are, the sharper we have to be. If the Coca-Cola company didn't exist, we'd pray for someone to invent them. And on the other side of the fence, I'm sure the folks at Coke would say that nothing contributes as much to the present-day success of the Coca-Cola company than... Pepsi. ³ That relationship began to fray in the early 2000s, however, as U.S. per-capita CSD consumption started to decline. By 2009, the average American drank 46 gallons of CSDs per year, the lowest CSD consumption level since 1989.4 At the same time, the two companies experienced their own distinct ups and downs; Coke suffered several operational setbacks while Pepsi charted a new, aggressive course in alternative beverages and snack acquisitions. As the cola wars continued into the 21st century, Coke and Pepsi faced new challenges: Could they boost flagging domestic CSD sales? How could they compete in the growing non-CSD category that demanded different bottling, pricing, and brand strategies? What had to be done to ensure sustainable growth and profitability? Economics of the U.S. CSD Industry Americans consumed 23 gallons of CSDs annually in 1970, and consumption grew by an average of 3% per year over the next three decades (see Exhibit 1). Fueling this growth were the increasing availability of CSDs and the introduction of diet and flavored varieties. Declining real (inflation- adjusted) prices that made CSDs more affordable played a significant role as well.5 There were many alternatives to CSDs, including beer, milk, coffee, bottled water, juices, tea, powdered drinks, wine, Professor David B. Yoffie and Research Associate Michael Slind prepared the original version of this case, "Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006," HBS No. 706-447. This version was prepared by Professor David B. Yoffie and Research Associate Renee Kim. This case was developed from published sources. HBS cases are developed solely as the basis for class discussion. Cases are not intended to serve as endorsements, sources of primary data, or illustrations of effective or ineffective management. Copyright © 2010, 2011 President and Fellows of Harvard College. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, call 1-800-545- 7685, write Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA 02163, or go to www.hbsp.harvard.edu/educators. This publication may not be digitized, photocopied, or otherwise reproduced, posted, or transmitted, without the permission of Harvard Business School.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Bargaining Power of Buyers in the Soft Drink Industry A Porter Five Forces Analysis The bargaining power of buyers in the soft drink industry is moderate to strong depending on the specific segment of ... View the full answer
Related Book For
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these general management questions
-
1. How strong are the competitive forces confronting J. Crew in the market for specialty retail? Do a [Michael Porter] five-forces analysis to support your answer. (see chapter 3 in the textfor...
-
Planning is one of the most important management functions in any business. A front office managers first step in planning should involve determine the departments goals. Planning also includes...
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
During 2018, Susan incurred and paid the following expenses for Beth (her daughter), Ed (her father), and herself: Surgery for...
-
Briefly explain whether you agree with the following statement: "The Federal Reserve is limited in its ability to issue paper currency by the amount of gold the federal government has in Fort Knox....
-
Compute the work done by the variable force in the graph of F versus x in Fig. 5.29. 8.0H 6.0 4.0 2.0 Distance (m) 0 1.0 2. 3.0 4.0 -4.0 -6.0 -8.0
-
The Arrow-Pratt relative risk aversion coefficient is \[\mu(x)=\frac{x U^{\prime \prime}(x)}{U^{\prime}(x)} .\] Show that the utility functions $U(x)=\ln x$ and $U(x)=\gamma x^{\gamma}$ have constant...
-
Twelve tasks, with times and precedence requirements as shown in the following table, are to be assigned to workstations using a cycle time of 1.5 minutes. Two heuristic rules will be tried: (1)...
-
Sheffield Company estimates that unit sales will be 13,000 in quarter 1, 18,200 in quarter 2, 19,500 in quarter 3, and 23,400 in quarter 4. Using a unit selling price of $68 per unit. Prepare the...
-
The duties of a buyer agent inclue all of foolowing except a ) ) evaluating properties b ) ) preparing written offer on property c ) ) maintaning the confidentiality d ) ) negotiating on behalf of...
-
Create a CASH Flow chart and NPW graph. Answer the following questions. The equipment will cost $730,000 and lasts the entire 12 year project. At the end of 12 years, the equipment will be sold for...
-
The Western Mountain Company has prepared department overhead budgets for budgeted-volume levels before allocations as follows: (Click the icon to view the department overhead budgets.)
-
Make a 5-year pro forma for the property. All analysis should be "before-tax". Ignore depreciation and taxable income. What market rents per square foot are you assuming in the proforma? Explain and...
-
1. Draw a single Michaelis-Menten plot graph for the above data with an appropriate title (units) and axis. 2. Draw a single Lineweaver-Burk plot graph. Please include additionally: a trend line for...
-
The magnetic flux through the loop shown in the accompanying figure varies with time according to Pm - Poe-at) sin (wt), where Po=4.5 x 10-7 m, alpha = 3.5s(-), and w = 120 rad/s. What are the...
-
Bedrock Company reported a December 31 ending inventory balance of $412,000. The following additional information is also available: The ending inventory balance of $412,000 included $72,000 of...
-
How is use of the word consistent helpful in fraud reports?
-
The Census of Wholesale Trade and the Census of Retail Trade are published every five years by the Department of Commerce. The most recent census was taken in 2002 and the one before that was in...
-
Discuss the major issues facing the channel manager with respect to where buyers make their purchases.
-
Identify the various flows in marketing channelsand the direction of the flows. Why is the concept of channel flows useful for a better understanding of channel management?
-
Example 17.5 showed that a thin film whose thickness is one quarter of the wavelength of light in the film serves as an antireflection coating when coated on glass. In Example 17.5, \(n_{\text {film...
-
Give a specific example of a process that has the energy changes and transfers described. (For example, if the question states " \(\Delta E_{\mathrm{th}}>0, W=0\)," you are to describe a process that...
-
Give a specific example of a process that has the energy changes and transfers described. (For example, if the question states " \(\Delta E_{\mathrm{th}}>0, W=0\)," you are to describe a process that...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App