1. Do you agree with the court’s decision? Why or why not? Do you think the outcome would have been the same if the genders were reversed and females were prevented from working at the club?
2. If you were the employer in this case, what would you do?
3. Do you think Title VII was made to address this type of situation, that is, where a private commercial enterprise wishes to have a particular clientele served a particular way? Explain.

The employer asserts that the jobs at issue require a substantial amount of physical contact with members’ bodies and that they are exposed to nudity in the club locker room, shower, and bathroom, during orientation sessions when they show club facilities to new members. They argue that it would be impossible for WWW to reassign job duties in order to avoid intruding on members’ privacy interests, since the conduct which infringes on privacy interests amounts to the essence of the jobs in question.