Question: 1. Do you believe that auditors should be held liable for failing to discover fraud in situations such as ZZZZ Best, where top management goes
2. Discuss the red flags that existed in the ZZZZ Best case and evaluate Ernst & Whinneys efforts with respect to fraud risk assessment. Do you think Ernst & Whinneys relationship with ZZZZ Best influenced risk assessment and the work done on the audit?
3. These are selected numbers from the financial statements of ZZZZ Best for fiscal years 1985 and 1986:
.png)
What calculations or analyses would you make with these numbers that might help you assess whether the financial relationships are reasonable? Given the facts of the case, what inquiries might you make of management based on your analysis?
4. What factors do you think motivated Minkow to return to his evil ways after becoming a respected member of the community following his release from prison in the ZZZZ Best fraud?
5. Using Kohlbergs stages of moral development, how would you characterize Minkows actions after being released from prison in the ZZZZ Best fraud? Explain the effects of Minkows actions on the stakeholders who relied on him to act in a professionalmanner.
1985 1986 Sales Cost of goods sold Accounts receivable Cash Current liabilities Notes payable-current $1,240,524 S4,845,347 576,694 2,050,779 0 693,773 87,014 2,930 1,768,435 0 780,507 30,321
Step by Step Solution
3.29 Rating (184 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Auditors should be held liable for failing to plan and perform the audit to discover material fraud There were many red flags that the auditors could have observed and been tipped off to the fraud T... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
376-B-O-B-B-E (908).docx
120 KBs Word File
