1. Employees who were not on disability leave and were laid off effective June 12 received no further compensation from the company. What justification is there for compensation being continued to the employee on disability leave?
2. Regardless of the contract language, the employee in this grievance was a laid-off employee by definition, would not have received wages, and therefore can suffer no wage loss due to injury or illness. Why, then, did the arbitrator award the continuation of such benefits?