Question: 1. How unwieldy would it be to allow dispute resolution mechanisms to interfere with criminal prosecutions in the U.S. courts? Why would you think the
1. How unwieldy would it be to allow dispute resolution mechanisms to interfere with criminal prosecutions in the U.S. courts? Why would you think the U.S. would never agree to this defense?
2. What is the purpose of having a dispute resolution mechanism in place in a treaty if it could not be used by the citizens of the country who is a signatory?
3. After a case like this, would you expect the GATS Dispute Resolution Board to take up the issue of illegal gambling in the U.S. as a denial of the GATS treaty?
2. What is the purpose of having a dispute resolution mechanism in place in a treaty if it could not be used by the citizens of the country who is a signatory?
3. After a case like this, would you expect the GATS Dispute Resolution Board to take up the issue of illegal gambling in the U.S. as a denial of the GATS treaty?
Step by Step Solution
★★★★★
3.30 Rating (159 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
1 To allow international agreements of any kind to influence US law would wreak h... View full answer
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
Document Format (1 attachment)
556-L-B-L-A-E-L (669).docx
120 KBs Word File
