Question: 1. If you analyze the courts decision in this case from the natural law and utilitarian perspectives, what do you conclude? 2. Assume you are
1. If you analyze the court’s decision in this case from the natural law and utilitarian perspectives, what do you conclude?
2. Assume you are a judge on this case who disagrees with the decision of the court. Make an argument as to why this case was wrongly decided.
Borden, J.
The . issue in this appeal is whether a release signed by the plaintiff, Jessica Reardon, indemnifying the defendants, Windswept Farm, LLC, and its owners, William Raymond and Mona Raymond, from an action brought in negligence, precludes the plaintiff from recovering damages. More specifically, the question before this court is whether the release signed by the plaintiff violates public policy pursuant to our holding Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp.. (2005).
Step by Step Solution
3.33 Rating (174 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 From the natural law perspective it can be argued that the riding academy was being unfair both in ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
179-L-B-L-L-E (1436).docx
120 KBs Word File
