Question: 1. In its opinion, the court pointed out that the duty to act in good faith does not apply to lenders seeking payment on demand
2. If National City had demanded “ payment of the line” instead of just indicating that there was a possibility it might do so in the future, would the outcome of this case have been any different? Explain.
3. Why might a creditor such as National City Bank prefer a note that is payable on demand?
4. Why might a debtor such as Reger Development agree to a note that includes a term making it payable on demand?
Plaintiff-appellant Reger Development, LLC * * * is an Illinois limited liability company involved in real estate development. Kevin Reger is Reger Development’s principal and sole member. Defendant- appellee National City Bank * * * had lent money to Reger Development for several previous projects.
Step by Step Solution
3.34 Rating (172 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 By its very nature a demand instrument allows the holder to demand payment at any time from the appropriate party Good faith plays no role in this t... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
311-L-B-L-N-I (271).docx
120 KBs Word File
