Question: 1. Romanelli argued that Schor was acting outside his scope of authority and thus no liability for the principals exists. Does that strike you as
1. Romanelli argued that Schor was acting outside his scope of authority and thus no liability for the principals exists. Does that strike you as convincing?
2. What remedy does Romanelli have against Schor?
Romanelli hired Schor as an accountant and financial advisor for his business and personal matters. Schor suggested opening accounts at a new bank in order to obtain a lower interest rate on a line of credit. Romanelli, as principal of Romanelli, Inc., signed a business account application, corporate resolution, and signature card and gave it to Schor. Schor used this account to embezzle several hundred thousand dollars from Romanelli.
Step by Step Solution
3.41 Rating (179 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 This question is intended to spur discussion on the type of li... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
348-L-B-L-L-E (2385).docx
120 KBs Word File
