Question: 1. Romanelli argued that Schor was acting outside his scope of authority and thus no liability for the principals exists. Does that strike you as

1. Romanelli argued that Schor was acting outside his scope of authority and thus no liability for the principals exists. Does that strike you as convincing?

2. What remedy does Romanelli have against Schor?


Romanelli hired Schor as an accountant and financial advisor for his business and personal matters. Schor suggested opening accounts at a new bank in order to obtain a lower interest rate on a line of credit. Romanelli, as principal of Romanelli, Inc., signed a business account application, corporate resolution, and signature card and gave it to Schor. Schor used this account to embezzle several hundred thousand dollars from Romanelli.


Step by Step Solution

3.41 Rating (179 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 This question is intended to spur discussion on the type of li... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

348-L-B-L-L-E (2385).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!