1. The primary reason for including a grievance process in a collective bargaining agreement is to provide the parties with a means to resolve disputes that arise under the terms of that agreement. If someone has been discriminated against in violation of federal law, even if the contract contains an antidiscrimination clause, should he or she be required to process this complaint through the grievance procedure?
2. The conservative nature of the current Supreme Court has led court observers to believe that the Court might change its prior ruling under this case and require claimants to process their discrimination charges through the grievance procedure. What do you think?