Question: 1. The union claimed the employees lost a benefit when the company changed the use of compensatory time for illness. As the use was permitted
1. The union claimed the employees lost a benefit when the company changed the use of compensatory time for illness. As the use was permitted if the employee had no sick leave available, how were the employees damaged?
2. The company paid employees the same wage whether the time was credited against accrued sick leave, compensatory time, or vacation. Why would the employer care which leave was used?
3. (a) As the arbitrator, give your reasons for ruling in the union's favor.
(b) Now give your reasons for ruling in the company's favor.
Step by Step Solution
3.47 Rating (160 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Answer 1 The employees were not damaged because if they had accrued sick leave they would be paid ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
1434-L-B-L-A-A-E-L(1295).docx
120 KBs Word File
