Question: 1. The union claimed the employees lost a benefit when the company changed the use of compensatory time for illness. As the use was permitted

1. The union claimed the employees lost a benefit when the company changed the use of compensatory time for illness. As the use was permitted if the employee had no sick leave available, how were the employees damaged?

2. The company paid employees the same wage whether the time was credited against accrued sick leave, compensatory time, or vacation. Why would the employer care which leave was used?

3. (a) As the arbitrator, give your reasons for ruling in the union's favor.

(b) Now give your reasons for ruling in the company's favor.

Step by Step Solution

3.47 Rating (160 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 Answer 1 The employees were not damaged because if they had accrued sick leave they would be paid ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

1434-L-B-L-A-A-E-L(1295).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!