Question: 1. Was Johnsons misrepresentation material? 2. What is the appropriate remedy? Johnsons father (and beneficiary) argued that he should pay the company the difference between
1. Was Johnson’s misrepresentation material?
2. What is the appropriate remedy? Johnson’s father (and beneficiary) argued that he should pay the company the difference between the low premium of a nonsmoker and the higher premium the company would have charged if it had known that Johnson smoked. Do you agree?
3. What is the moral of this story?
Step by Step Solution
3.48 Rating (164 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Yes the court held that it was 2 The court held that a poli... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
86-L-B-L-P-C-L (245).docx
120 KBs Word File
