1. Was the foreman's "prediction" that the employer would sell the trucks before accepting the union, a good indication of the employer's dual goal, that is, of satisfying the ICC and busting the union?
2. How could the employer have eliminated the trucking department without violating its good faith obligation?
3. Although the court upheld the Board's decision, it reversed the Board's order requiring the employer to resume its trucking operation. The court noted that all the trucks were sold already and such a remedy may well frustrate the union's future ability to bargain. Can you speculate as to the court's reasons?