Question: 1. What indicated that the terms in the agreement at issue in this case were accepted? 2. What were the appellant's arguments in support of
1. What indicated that the terms in the agreement at issue in this case were accepted?
2. What were the appellant's arguments in support of her claim? Which of those contentions did the court imply was irrelevant? Why?
3. How did the court distinguish its conclusion in this case from its decision in Beck-Hummel?
Step by Step Solution
3.39 Rating (161 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 One of the elements for the formation of a valid contract is agreement x mutual assent to the terms of a bargain Agreement is evidenced by an offer and an acceptance An offerees acceptance of an off... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
1268-L-B-L-P-A-C-L(1118).docx
120 KBs Word File