1. What is the imputation doctrine? What public policy reasons support imputing the fraud of a corporate officer to the corporation?
2. What circumstances in this case suggest that MB should be held liable for Bloom’s fraud?
3. What conditions did the court place on the application of the imputation doctrine in this case?
4. MB, which was already in financial distress, had to cease operations as a result of Bloom’s fraud. How might MB have discovered the fraud before it grew so large as to have dire effects?