Question: 1. What would the bank have to do prove to successfully bring a law suit against Kay & Lee for ordinary negligence? Use legal principles
1. What would the bank have to do prove to successfully bring a law suit against Kay & Lee for ordinary negligence? Use legal principles to support your answer.
2. Changing the facts of the case, assume the client hired Kay & Lee to audit the financial statements, explaining that the purpose of the audit is to negotiate a loan. The name of the bank is unknown to the auditors. Under which legal principle could the auditors be held legally liable for the ordinary negligence? Which case(s) in the book support your opinion?
3. From an ethical perspective why is it important for an auditor to properly audit inventory and accounts receivable when it knows a bank may rely on the audited financial statements?
Step by Step Solution
3.54 Rating (171 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Second National Bank Trust would be considered a known user so that the auditor could be liable for ordinary negligence The bank would have to prove that there was a false representation by Kay Lee ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
376-B-O-B-B-E (946).docx
120 KBs Word File
