Question: 1. Who prevails and why? 2. Are the minimum contacts requirements being met? Why or why not? 3. Since the car is inherently mobile, does
2. Are the minimum contacts requirements being met? Why or why not?
3. Since the car is inherently mobile, does that mean that jurisdiction is appropriate in any state where the car has traveled?
Step by Step Solution
3.45 Rating (165 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 WorldWide Volkswagen Corp prevails because the Oklahoma court does not have personal jurisdi... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
348-L-B-L-L-E (2319).docx
120 KBs Word File
