Question: 1. Why couldnt this case have been covered by Title VII on the basis of gender? 2. If Enriquezs employment with Health Systems were not

1. Why couldn’t this case have been covered by Title VII on the basis of gender?
2. If Enriquez’s employment with Health Systems were not terminated would she still have a claim for discrimination? Would the conduct of her co-workers and managers have been sufficient to prevail on a discrimination suit? Why or why not?

Enriquez, a biological male, was hired as a medical director by Health Systems and subsequently began an external transformation from male to female as a result of his gender identity disorder. During the transformation, Enriquez’s co-workers and managers voiced discomfort with the transformation and a manager requested that Enriquez halt the transformation process and go back to her prior appearance. When her contract came up for renewal, Enriquez was told that her contract would not be renewed unless she ceased the transformation. Enriquez refused and she was terminated.

Step by Step Solution

3.56 Rating (184 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 This case could not have been covered by Title VII on the basis of gender because federal ... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

348-L-B-L-L-E (2403).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!