Question: 1. Why didnt the contract order signed by the parties constitute a binding contract for the sale of goods? 2. According to the court, Romero

1. Why didn’t the “contract order” signed by the parties constitute a binding contract for the sale of goods?

2. According to the court, “Romero and Scoggin-Dickey were both buyers and sellers.” What did the court mean by this statement?


Jessie Romero went to the Scoggin-Dickey Chevrolet-Buick, Inc., dealership in Lubbock, Texas, and sought to purchase a 2006 Silverado pickup from Fred Morales. Romero proposed to purchase the pickup by assigning the dealership the factory rebates, supplying two trade-in vehicles (a 2003 Mitsubishi Montero SP and a 2002 Chevrolet Silverado pickup), and paying the cash difference. At the time of the negotiations, Romero did not have the proposed trade-in vehicles on the lot for inspection by Scoggin-Dickey.


Step by Step Solution

3.61 Rating (169 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 No binding contract was formed because the sale could not be completed until Scoggin Dickey r... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

212-L-B-L-S (249).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!