Question: 1. Why do some courts apply a standard for imposing vicarious liability that does not rely on motive or purpose to determine whether an agent's

1. Why do some courts apply a standard for imposing vicarious liability that does not rely on motive or purpose to determine whether an agent's tortious conduct falls within the scope of employment?
2. Why, in some states, are the boundaries of work time and space no longer essential factors in determining the scope of employment in an agency relationship?
3. Who does the result in this case benefit? Why?

Step by Step Solution

3.35 Rating (170 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 A principal can be held liable for a tort committed by an agent under the doctrine of respond eat superior if the commission of the tort falls within the scope of employment To fall within this scop... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

1268-L-B-L-P-A-C-L(1202).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!