Question: 1. Why was it unclear whether Wards pretermination actions constituted direct competition with his employer or were mere planning activities? 2. Suppose that Wards planning

1. Why was it unclear whether Ward’s pretermination actions constituted direct competition with his employer or were mere planning activities?
2. Suppose that Ward’s planning and development efforts were focused on a product that would in no way compete with Taser’s products. Would such efforts have breached his duty of loyalty to Taser in any way? Explain fully.
3. Are there other duties to his employer that Ward might have breached in addition to the duty of loyalty as Taser alleged here? Discuss.
4. If the judgment in the case of remand is again in Taser’s favor, what might be an appropriate remedy?

Step by Step Solution

3.36 Rating (165 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 The court found it difficult to draw the line between mere preparation and active competition in this case because of the nature of Tasers business Taser was not just in the business of selling elec... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

311-L-B-L-A-E-L (545).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!