Question: 1. Why was this bailment a mutual benefit bailment? 2. What duty did the Leach Brothers fail to meet in this case? What should they
2. What duty did the Leach Brothers fail to meet in this case? What should they have done that they didn’t do?
Painter, Presiding Judge
Plaintiff-appellee James W. Croskey left his car at a repair shop for installation of an engine and transmission after a first attempted repair failed, only to have his car stolen from the shop’s lot twice. The owners of the repair shop, defendants-appellants, Carl Leach and Joe Leach, d/b/a Leach Brothers Automotive Services and d/b/a Joe Leach Service Center, appeal a Hamilton County Municipal Court judgment in Croskey’s favor.
Step by Step Solution
3.51 Rating (168 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 When Croskey delivered his vehicle to the Leaches for the specific purpose of having the engine a... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
179-L-B-L-L-E (1579).docx
120 KBs Word File
