1. Why was this bailment a mutual benefit bailment? 2. What duty did the Leach Brothers fail to meet in...

Question:

1. Why was this bailment a mutual benefit bailment?
2. What duty did the Leach Brothers fail to meet in this case? What should they have done that they didn’t do?

Painter, Presiding Judge
Plaintiff-appellee James W. Croskey left his car at a repair shop for installation of an engine and transmission after a first attempted repair failed, only to have his car stolen from the shop’s lot twice. The owners of the repair shop, defendants-appellants, Carl Leach and Joe Leach, d/b/a Leach Brothers Automotive Services and d/b/a Joe Leach Service Center, appeal a Hamilton County Municipal Court judgment in Croskey’s favor.

This problem has been solved!


Do you need an answer to a question different from the above? Ask your question!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  answer-question
View Solution
Create a free account to access the answer
Cannot find your solution?
Post a FREE question now and get an answer within minutes. * Average response time.
Question Posted: September 15, 2012 07:20:09