Question: 1. Why was this bailment a mutual benefit bailment? 2. What duty did the Leach Brothers fail to meet in this case? What should they

1. Why was this bailment a mutual benefit bailment?
2. What duty did the Leach Brothers fail to meet in this case? What should they have done that they didn’t do?

Painter, Presiding Judge
Plaintiff-appellee James W. Croskey left his car at a repair shop for installation of an engine and transmission after a first attempted repair failed, only to have his car stolen from the shop’s lot twice. The owners of the repair shop, defendants-appellants, Carl Leach and Joe Leach, d/b/a Leach Brothers Automotive Services and d/b/a Joe Leach Service Center, appeal a Hamilton County Municipal Court judgment in Croskey’s favor.

Step by Step Solution

3.51 Rating (168 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

1 When Croskey delivered his vehicle to the Leaches for the specific purpose of having the engine a... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

179-L-B-L-L-E (1579).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!