Question: A builder constructed a house according to plans provided by the owner. The contract specified that only Reading brand pipe was to be used in

A builder constructed a house according to plans provided by the owner. The contract specified that only Reading brand pipe was to be used in the plumbing. After the house was completed, the owner discovered that another brand of pipe had been used. The owner refused final payment and demanded that the pipe be replaced with Reading pipe, which would have involved major reconstruction. Evidence at trial was that the two brands of pipe were of the same general quality. Did the owner have to make final payment, or did the pipe have to be replaced? [Jacob & Youngs v. Kent, 129 N.E. 889, Ct. App., N Y (1921)]

Step by Step Solution

3.36 Rating (171 Votes )

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock

Justice Cardozo held that the owned had to make payment and the pipe was not to be rep... View full answer

blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Document Format (1 attachment)

Word file Icon

154-L-B-L-L-E (1020).docx

120 KBs Word File

Students Have Also Explored These Related Business Law Questions!