Question: A certain process for manufacturing integrated circuits has been in use for a period of time, and it is known that 12% of the circuits
a. One of the engineers suggests that the test proves that the new process is no better than the old process, since the proportion of defectives in the sample is the same. Is this conclusion justified? Explain.
b. Assume that there had been only 11 defective circuits in the sample of 100. Would this have proven that the new process is better? Explain.
c. Which outcome represents stronger evidence that the new process is better: finding 11 defective circuits in the sample, or finding 2 defective circuits in the sample?
Step by Step Solution
3.28 Rating (163 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a No What is important is the population proportion of defectives the sample ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
944-M-S-P (8351).docx
120 KBs Word File
