Question: a. Was it fair for Sinclair to force Sinven to pay dividends so large that it faced bankruptcy? b. Was it fair for Sinclair to
b. Was it fair for Sinclair to hire other, wholly owned subsidiaries rather than Sinven?
c. Was it fair for Sinclair not to force its other subsidiaries to abide by their contracts with Sinven?
Sinclair Oil owned 97 percent of Sinven. Sinven's minority shareholders complained that Sinclair:
• Forced Sinven to pay dividends so large that the subsidiary faced bankruptcy,
• Hired other, wholly owned subsidiaries but not Sinven, and
• Refused to force its other subsidiaries to abide by their contracts with Sinven. For instance, a Sinclair subsidiary signed a contract with Sinven to buy crude oil but failed to purchase the required amount.
Step by Step Solution
3.38 Rating (164 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a The court did not object to the high dividend policy because the minority sh... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
842-L-B-L-L-E (4378).docx
120 KBs Word File
